It vilified a President that actually helped the cause. So the film sucks cause it can't get that part of history right. And therefore a bunch of fools will think that President Johnson was like that when he wasn't.
"Who ever said a non-white/straight person getting overlooked automatically is an example of prejudice? That's not the argument anyone is making, and you damn well know it. This conversation is larger than just Selma- it is a sad state of affairs when all 20 actors nominated for an Academy Award this year are white actors. This isn't because people of color are doing lesser work, but it's that their work is consistently overlooked and thus can get no traction like other major players in Hollywood can. Selma was one of the best reviewed movies of the year and got mostly ignored, and a jingoistic and poorly reviewed film like American Sniper gets showered with praise because it's Eastwood, who by virtue of being a white straight man, has so much more opportunity than anyone involved with Selma with the exception of Oprah Winfrey."
Uh, do you know how long it's been since last there was an all "white" nominated list as this year? A really, freakin' long time ago. Much ado about NOTHING.
I ignored this film and WILL NOT SEE IT cause of the crappy trailer (not to mention the lie about President Johnson) that used a stupid song. So apparently they were only looking for specific people to see this film about MLK Jr. How...quaint.
And American Sniper isn't poorly reviewed. Maybe you mean by comparison, but considering more people are seeing and reviewing American Sniper than Selma. This isn't the fault of the color of the film's actors, but the fault of the director and the people involved.
Updated On: 1/20/15 at 01:31 AM