My opinion is that once Lucy stopped focusing on acting and started running a studio, she never again found the on-screen success she once had. She was too busy taking over the planet as a top executive and one of the most powerful women ever in Hollywood. She switched from "talent" to "management," and once you do that, it's hard to go back (although she tried many times). She was too busy controlling things to concentrate on her own performances. It's happened to other people as well, who have left performing for "the other side" as directors, producers, or choreographers, etc. It's tough to go back to focusing on "just performing."
I suppose a good companion to "Mame" would be "what were they thinking" by passing up Ethel Merman for the film version of Gypsy, but she was in serious consideration for it (along with Judy Holliday and Judy Garland). And Roz got the part.
Two others for "what were they thinking?" ...
I love everything about the movie "A Christmas Story" and all of its vintage charm, with the exception of Melinda Dillon's hideous, early 1980s perm! Her hairstyle is so out of step with the rest of the movie, and she's the main female character. It's beyond distracting to see her with that hairdo. Even the extras look more appropriate.
Saturday Night Fever, while far from a masterpiece, is a good, solid film that made Travolta a star and has one of the biggest selling soundtracks of all-time ... but what's with Karen Lynn Gorney (talk about a Brooklyn accent, albeit an appropriate one!), cast as Stephanie ... and SHE CAN'T DANCE? She's absolutely terrible. A total klutz. And it's essential to the plot that Stephanie is terrific and Travolta is swept away by her "talent" on the dance floor. It makes me laugh every time I watch her at the ballet barre, almost teetering over with her knee bent, doing her daily exercises. It's like a bad Carol Burnett sketch, except it's legit.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Updated On: 1/26/14 at 08:33 AM