Why would this cause Equity theaters to go non-union? That makes no sense. This change won’t affect union theaters; it would just broaden their hiring pool. There’s nothing attached to this that makes it more onerous to be an Equity house. There will certainly be a rush to join the union, but there will still remain a robust amount of non-union actors because Equity’s membership rules regarding only working on union contracts still remains. In areas with lots of non-union work, that means it would still remain logical for local actors to stay non-union. In fact, it incentivizes actors to take ANY work- union or not- because it all makes them eligible to join now.
Equity- or any union- cannot just conjure up work from thin air. Hiring union members costs money, which is not something many theaters have much of. This would most affect non-union tours, which have more money than most smaller regionals and are affordable to produce mostly because they can underpay their actors and SMs.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."