And right, Kad. I should have been clearer in my post, I meant that the producers tried to pull that but the NomCom rejected it.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
I think Streep most definitely has a shot at a fourth Academy Award, Musicaldudepeter.
I also think her closest competition may be Margo Martindale.
But really it all depends on how they translate the play for the screen. The early trailers did not inspire me with confidence, but ultimately I think this is going to be a very well received film.
well, that certainly doesnt look as happy. Funny that the article refers to Letts and HER award winning play.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
It's called marketing. They'd have to majorly change Letts' story (which I doubt they'll do, given that Letts wrote the screenplay) for this to end up being about overcoming family drama.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
For some reason I skipped like two pages of conversation and was responding to the last comment on page 2! Haha, Besty, that made me laugh. If they changed his gender, then all bets are off.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
I just saw the full trailer at a theater today. Wasn't crazy about Roberts being cast but I like what I saw of her in the trailer. Streep, not so much.
Streep is not winning a fourth Oscar this year. It took them 30 years to award her a second Best Actress Oscar (3rd overall), and they did so with an OTT performance in a sh!tty movie, a la Pacino/Scent of a Woman. They're not gonna give her another, let alone a record-tying one so soon. Give it up fangurls!
Furthermore, I agree with uncageg, Streep looks horrendous in the trailer.
Salve, Regina, Mater misericordiae
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
"Streep is not winning a fourth Oscar this year. It took them 30 years to award her a second Best Actress Oscar (3rd overall), and they did so with an OTT performance in a sh!tty movie, a la Pacino/Scent of a Woman. They're not gonna give her another, let alone a record-tying one so soon. Give it up fangurls! "
You just never know darling. You just never know. I am sure the Academy would LOVE a "Meryl vs Oprah " show.
Remember that there will be other women in that category also. People like Lupita Nyong'o, Margo Martindale, Cameron Diaz, Amy Adams, Sally Hawkins, Catherine Keener, Laura Linney, Octavia Spencer, etc. etc.
Decisions made in each race in those 30 years between Oscars always relied on competition in the fields. It's always subjective. (Warning: here be personal opinions.) Sometimes better performances beat her (Susan Sarandon in DEAD MAN WALKING or Hilary Swank in BOYS DON'T CRY), sometimes leads of better films beat her (Gwyneth Paltrow in SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE), sometimes legends whose time had come to win (Helen Mirren in THE QUEEN, Sarandon as well), in every race the field has a different feel and is shaped by many variables.
There is no "they" and there is no overarching plan to how Awards will be given out in one's career. Streep very well could win an award for this; it's a hell of a role, she's a hell of an actress and we haven't seen it or really any of her likely competitors, save sparse exceptions.
There is so much that could happen, this far out, that the only thing with certainty that it's safe to argue about the Oscars is that arguing something with certainty is lunacy.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
Same as I'd grant John Williams a nomination for just about any film he scores.
ETA: Fun fact - 1992 was the last year John Williams scored at least one film and *wasn't* nominated for an Oscar.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.
Coach Bob knew it all along: you've got to get obsessed and stay obsessed. You have to keep passing the open windows. (John Irving, The Hotel New Hampshire)
I guess I'm just not seeing what most of us are seeing. Meryl looks like she's going in once again. She's an actor who loves what she does; and what a delicious role for her to relish in. Awards are no true testament to anyone's work and without awards or any such trivial things I'm sure she'll put the work in like we've come to expect from her time and again.
"Girl, this cupcake is the jumpoff"- Adriane Lenox