Speaking as one of the people who hated the screens in Anastasia (and to a lesser extent, in Mean Girls):
There are tons of appropriate, tasteful, and highly creative ways to use projections and LED screens. For me, it largely depends on the setting for the show, in conjunction with the amount that it's being used, and whether it's being used as a crutch, or as an essential storytelling tool. A show like Curious Incident (to use a common example) is able to use a ton of projections because it's built into the storytelling concept in a brilliant way. And then there are shows like Wicked, which only uses projections in a subtle way, and it's well-integrated into the lighting design so that it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb. But something like Anastasia? Set in the 1800s (or whatever)? The projections feel garish and distracting.
I also hate when projections/screens are used as a substitute for the storytelling tools in film, especially when it's a show adapted from a movie. Because at a certain point, I find myself thinking: if you're just going to use these screens to make this feel like a movie, why did you bother adapting this for the stage in the first place? (usually, the answer is just: $$$)
For those reasons, I have to confess that I don't think I would enjoy the production of Tangled you're imagining. I do like idea of creating a contrast between a LED set and a real set - I actually think that's a pretty creative way to use projections as a legitimate storytelling tool for the stage. I just don't think it would be a good fit for Tangled, personally, because of the world/time period it's set in. I also don't like the idea of telling backstory through projections, because again, now you're just in film territory. Unless the images are projected onto the physical set in a way that feels seamless, so that it seems like the paintings on the (physical) wall are coming to life.
Updated On: 1/18/21 at 06:16 PM