Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
"Unfortunately some people think it works only in 1 direction."
It does only work in one direction. Perhaps you're thinking more along the lines of prejudice or bigotry? If you're thinking?
emilyfaye, aren't you two white women? Maybe you should just get infuriated with the patriarchy again.
I wouldn't say I was disgusted by the article- I mostly found it pretty uninteresting, which is par for the course for most of broadway.com's material. However, I do think the decision to put white faces on the black bodies of the actual characters was cringe-worthy and unnecessary.
But glad to see that this post has brought out BWW's regular clan who likes to pretend that race isn't still very relevant in this country.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
You shoulda spelled it with a "k"!
LOL first you guys tell me that I'm racist and shouldn't single out black people, and now you're telling him that colorblindness is bad. Y'all needa get it together !
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
Turning black characters white isn't "color blindness."
But it's definitely a tempest in a teapot over something likely to be seen by literally tens of people.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
It is HILARIOUS that Ivy Lynn has black hands.
Man, what a ding dong Paul Wontorek was to publish that.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
Whaaa???? I DEMAND a remix!!! I vant to dance.
HAHAHA. That's brilliant.
I haven't read the offending article. However, could part of the satire been that the writer suggested only straight white women for a show that has multiple ethnicities and sexual orientations?
We've often discussed the question of "color-blind" casting. I happen to believe that it is NOT racist to ensure that minorities play minority characters, while using more open criteria for casting characters that are usually played by white performers. My rationale is that, in a society where racism, sadly, still exists, it is not feasible to abolish race awareness in casting minority roles; that would merely freeze a status quo in which minorities are under-represented.
I am a bit puzzled, however, by the recent brouhaha over Emma Stone's being cast as a character who is part Asian -- if I understand the rationale correctly, the character is frustrated that no one can tell that she is Asian by looking at her. Under those circumstances, casting most Asian actors would not have worked, IMO.
"Everybody but Dave19 click here "
Bitch, I'm Phyllis Rogers Stone.
This aggravated me so much when I saw this. Did the Broadway.com staff/interns simply forget that POC exist/are on the Broadway stage (though minimally)? Let's also not forget how extra white the Tonys were this year. Broadway producers need to invest in shows that include a diverse cast (and not ones that play stereotypical characters) more. Broadway needs to be better diversified. I cannot wait for Hamilton and Allegiance to open. I'm really tired, so I hope this makes sense. I would type this more eloquently if I were more awake.
There are lots of things wrong with that whole "article." One of which is that it makes very little sense. Am I the only one who thought the whole "Broadway killings, inmate, crime" thing was kinda confusing and weird? What was the point of it?
Broadway.com is such a freaking mess in so many ways, and I hate pretty much everything about it.
And yeah, that was weird how they poorly photoshopped white women's faces over the faces of POC. I mean, the exclusion of POC in that post would be a bit more understandable if (A) they were talking about a TV show which did NOT have such a racially diverse cast, and (B), if there had been ANY kind of pattern whatsoever that dictated the inclusion of those specific 8 actresses, instead of some of the many talented women of color on Broadway (especially since many of the women they did pick are not exactly the toast of Broadway in my humble opinion...)
Updated On: 6/16/15 at 02:51 AM
I didn't find the article to be racist or funny.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/23/11
"It does only work in one direction. Perhaps you're thinking more along the lines of prejudice or bigotry? If you're thinking?"
So separate things for black people is a good thing? That's what we need to teach our kids?
Speaking of bigotry.......
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/23/11
"LOL first you guys tell me that I'm racist and shouldn't single out black people, and now you're telling him that colorblindness is bad. Y'all needa get it together !"
Exactly, they want you to single out black people, as long as it is about things they like. If it is about things they don't like, their standards change all of a sudden.
Double standards. Racism works both ways. But apparently they've never thought of that.
The question is, do you want a separation or not. They clearly do, in convenient times.
Updated On: 6/16/15 at 08:13 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/23/11
" And yeah, that was weird how they poorly photoshopped white women's faces over the faces"
That photo was not about race. It was about certain personalities the creator likes.
Are you really forcing him to judge on race first?
I truly hope that one day you will evolve too.
Updated On: 6/16/15 at 08:19 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/29/08
I'm horrified by it as well, given the diversity of a show like Orange is the New Black. Here's an example of people who would be great on the show, off the top of my head: Karen Olivo, Rebecca Jones, Pippa Soo.
"However, could part of the satire been that the writer suggested only straight white women for a show that has multiple ethnicities and sexual orientations?"
No honey. Broadway.com is NOT smart enough for that.
Anyway, there's a whole thread here about how black people can't afford tickets to Hamilton, so this isn't really the place for intelligent discussion.
Updated On: 6/16/15 at 09:05 AM
I finally went to check out the article. It's stupid in its entirety and, I suppose, an attempt at humor. There is nothing racist or "whitewashed" about it. The (moronic) writer just made up a bunch of what ifs for his favorite b'way figures. There is nothing meaningful or hurtful in it at all.
Yes, persons of color are under represented on the b'way stage, but I don't see that this article has anything to do with that. Heck, it doesn't even deserve to be read. IF anything, write to the author and ask him why he didn't include any women of color. Who knows, maybe he did originally, and they edited it for fear THOSE comments would "seem" racist.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/29/08
How is there nothing whitewashed about the fact that it's only straight, white, women that were chosen? And photoshopped on the bodies of POC?
Because I don't think there is any malice or intent. Stupidity? Lack of awareness? Certainly.
Broadway.com is the theatre equivalent to a BuzzFeed knockoff.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/23/11
"How is there nothing whitewashed about the fact that it's only straight, white, women that were chosen? "
Seriously, you only would have been satisfied if the ladies in that picture (which only contains famous types the author just happens to like), were actually "gay" in real life? Seriously?
I'm done. There is no hope left for humanity....
Updated On: 6/16/15 at 09:49 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/22/03
Can't you imagine the thought process? They most likely thought it would be a stereotypical negative to put black actors in there. And they would've gotten away with it too if Ivy didn't have black hands.
Videos