Please tell me I'm not the only one who is horrified by this dumb article on Broadway.com.... I don't know how you do a play on Orange Is The New Black with ONLY WHITE PEOPLE buuuuuuuut Broadway.com will always find a way to F things up
"Please tell me I'm not the only one who is horrified by this dumb article on Broadway.com.... I don't know how you do a play on Orange Is The New Black with ONLY WHITE PEOPLE buuuuuuuut Broadway.com will always find a way to F things up
I don't joke about the underrepresentation of people of color in the theatre community. It's a very serious issue and it matters. Even when it's just a dumb article on an awful website it matters.
Without bread we'd just be hungry
but without theatre we'd be dead
Of course it matters! It makes me even angrier that they took the extra step and photo shopped the faces of these white actresses over the faces of the african americans. In the show, they makes tons of references to the color of their skin, so why would Broadway.com think it's approprite to change it?
Clearly the writer of the article did not look at race, but just at types.
I get tired of people hyperventilating about this. Thinking in race is what they do (and some people in this thread), and they are the true racists here.
Unfortunately they are too dumb to realize it and all they do is show that they look at color first. I refuse to do that, just like the writer of the article. I see people as human beings and will never look at color.
No one has to be concerned about visibility. We all know and love the great black characters in OITNB, we have a wonderful black president, a black Disney princess, wonderful black artists in the music industry, and a general percentage of black oscar winners that is actually higher than the percentage of black residents in the country, whole black films and actually no films are being made without black people in it, etc, etc, etc.
The real thing to be concerned about is to seize every opportunity to clarify the difference in races, like the topic starter and some others do. That's racist.
No healthy thinking human being would get upset over such an article. I truly hope people like that can see people as humans someday too, and not just as race.
Get the hell over yourself if you read an article of a writer that only mentions he would love to see certain personalities, which he happens to be a fan of, in a show that happens to have black people in it too.
Anyone else feel that outrage isn't outrage anymore but a theatrical attempt to prove how reactive and morally superior one is?
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
"Anyone else feel that outrage isn't outrage anymore but a theatrical attempt to prove how reactive and morally superior one is?"
You mean outrage like the topic starter insists that people start to think in race more?
Or outrage of people who say they should stop that, because it isn't helping? Because the second ones are only helping the first ones.
Let's say that the writer of the article would have put one black broadway person in there, not because he particularly likes him/her (because that's what this article was about), but just because he/she was black. Would that have been good? No. That would have been a choice out of racism. I am glad he chose to look at the persons, not at race.
I'm afraid I don't understand a thing you are saying.
Ah, Millenials!
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali