EVITA is a great show but not so much because of the writing but because of Hal Prince's staging of the original. Without that, the show is in trouble.
Of all the ALW shows it is the one most through-composed where the score develops and repeats key motifs. The lyrics by Tim Rice are better than average despite a few clunky lines.
Now if you REALLY want to be bored try to watch ASPECTS OF LOVE all the way through. Some beautiful melodies but the story and characters fail to generate any kind of theatrical excitement. What a waste.
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks." Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com
"People have their opinions and that doesn't mean that their opinions are wrong or right. I just take it with a grain of salt because opinions are like as*holes, everyone has one".
-Felicia Finley-
Phantom was directed by Prince and just like with Evita, the staging is what keeps it from being as mediocre as the score. I agree Evita is probably the best Lloyd Webber show though without the proper direction and the proper actress playing Evita, it simply crumbles.
I'm not a big Webber fan. I go back and forth on Phantom. IMO, it depends on the chemistry and talent on stage. I've never seen Evita or Cats, but I have absolutely no desire to see Cats. Joseph is unique and fun, and although the last touring version I saw of that was hideous. Starlight Express is one of the most painful nights of the theatre I've ever experienced.
So, that was the Drowsy Chaperone. Oh, I love it so much. I know it's not a perfect show...but it does what a musical is supposed to do. It takes you to another world, and it gives you a little tune to carry with you in your head for when you're feeling blue. Ya know?
JCS rates as my favorite Andrew Lloyd show. Though that isn't saying much, really
"Picture "The View," with the wisecracking, sympathetic sweethearts of that ABC television show replaced by a panel of embittered, suffering or enraged Arab women" -the Times review of Black Eyed
This is a response to my "boring Sondheim Shows" thread.
I admit, some of his shows are boring (like every other Composer) but many are amazing! No matter what you say about him, he can come up with the greatest melodies ever.
"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2
Also, I would like to add that many of the complaints of Webber is really should not be directed towards him. A lot of people complain about the actual shows itself, so should the blame be completely Webbers, or being split between the lyricist, director, actors, etc.
I would also like to add that Tim Rice and Webber need to get back together.
"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2
One show in particular that I enjoyed because it was so different from his other stuff was Beautiful Game.... played in the West End for a short time I think... I enjoyed it, not sure what the critics thought though.
"The stage is not merely the meeting place of all the arts, but it is also the return of art to life." -Oscar Wilde
DG, I thought the same thing just from the title. What do you know? This thread was started by AJ1985, who praised Sondheim in the other thread. Hmmmmmm.
Salve, Regina, Mater misericordiae
Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra
Salve, Salve Regina
Ad te clamamus exsules filii Eva
Ad te suspiramus, gementes et flentes
O clemens O pia
I love how people are so scared to say what they want. Everyone is like "oh, I really like this show, but I agree it's not that great and blah blah." If you like a show, be proud of it. I like Jesus Christ Superstar and Sunset Blvd. I'm not sure how either show could put you to sleep unless you took a hit of Benedryl before entering the theater. Evita is pretty good, but when I saw it, I wasn't too familiar with the story, so I was confused through most of it, and I hate the ending. I have yet to see CATS, but I'll see the tour when it comes around this season.
"I wouldn't call them masterpieces, but I love Evita and JCS. Eva is one of my dream roles."
See, that's what I don't get. Why say you like something and then totally discredit it within the same sentence. Don't be ashamed that you like ALW. I don't think anyone would say that about Sondheim. I just don't get why people are afraid to admit it. Obviously people like him, he's making bajillions (yeah, I said it) off of his shows.
I love ALW, I hated Cats and Phantom is just an ok show, but the man is a genious. Evita, Joseph, Sunset Blvd., Bombay Dreams(he did pretty much everything if you have watched the DVD Salaam Bombay), The Woman in White, etc. He deserves to be one of the most or maybe, the most influential man in the musical theatre industry.
"People have their opinions and that doesn't mean that their opinions are wrong or right. I just take it with a grain of salt because opinions are like as*holes, everyone has one".
-Felicia Finley-
How does he deserve to be the most influential man in musical theater industry? He wrote two major hits, yes, for that I admire him because someone who can make a hit out of a show as shallow and pointless as Cats has to have some sort of ingenuity. However, he has done NOTHING to advance the kind of musical theater that songwriters like Richard Rodgers, Oscar Hammerstein II, Lorenz Harts, Jerome Kern, and Frank Loesser so well introduced (shows with wit, cynicism, intelligent yet entertaining without underestimating the audience intellect), the kind of shows that Stephen Sondheim, Leonard Bernstein, John Kander, Fred Ebb, and Maury Yeston later deconstructed and perfectioned, and the musical theater that new songwriters like Adam Guettel, Lynn Ahrens, Stephen Flaherty, William Finn, and Michael John LaChiusa keep changing and perfectioning. Sorry if this post seems like a laundry list of songwriters, but I cannot stand it when someone calls Lloyd Webber a man who deserves to be influential or a "genius." If he were a genius then he'd have known Bombay Dreams needed A LOT of work before even getting a workshop let alone a Broadway staging, if he were such a great composer he'd have done justice to the mysterious and suspenseful Gothic novel Woman in White instead of making a 2-hour long bore, and he would also have cared about providing Norma Desmond with new layers of character and he'd have done a much better job at depicting her madness instead of turning one of the best American films into a rather bland show with twenty reprises and a big set to wow the audience.
IMO, a hideous waste. The only good song was "Our Kind of Love" which was, ironically, recycled from the Phantom 2 song. He should have just kept on with that... pulled a Meat Loaf / Jim Steinman "Bat Out Of Hell 2" on the theatre-world
Who can explain it, who can tell you why?
Fools give you reasons, wise men never try
-South Pacific
FOSCAS, you might want to re-phrase that one. So to you a show is not a major hit unless it plays on Broadway for at least 10 years or so? In that case A LOT of shows are NOT major hits, though they're making a lot of money, playing to sold-out houses night after night etc simply because they have only been around, say, like 5 years.
In those terms, he's had "two major hits" - ON BROADWAY!
You should remember:
STARLIGHT EXPRESS played in London for about 15 years EVITA ran in London for 8 years (and 4 on Broadway) JESUS CHRIST SUPERSTAR ran in London for 8 years ASPECTS OF LOVE ran in London for 6 years.
So I would definitely say he's had more than just "two major hits".
i was lucky enough years ago to get my first break on the west end in the beautifull game and thought it was an amazing show and quite hard hitting.I am not a fan of webber at all i think all his shows are very poor and just overblown rock operas but the was something about the BG.We got some really good reviews if i remember right but it just struggled to get an audience(i think a lot of people was put of by the football(they so missed the point hehe) The staging was so simple and the music was great i had a great time in that.
Rockfenris, I'm neutral as far as Lloyd Webber goes. I've thoroughly enjoyed some of his shows and absolutely hated others. But I can only hope that he never touches the idea of composing for a Phantom sequel again. If I recall correctly, wasn't it supposed to be based on Fredrick Forsyth's Phantom of Manhatten? That book was one of the biggest pieces of crap I've ever read, and would absolutely tank as a musical.
I am definitely not a big fan of Webber. His scores scream mediocrity. Hal Prince is truly why his shows have been successful. ALW couldn't write a smooth transition if it killed him. I was listening to Sunset Boulevard, which sounds like a combination of Cats, Phantom and a little Evita. Oh dear.
-jess-
"I think every actor on the stage should have a shirt that says,'believe it or not-I'm doing my best.'" -Alan Rickman