They do make a good point about Hadestown, which many reviews highlighted, but didn't emphasize. Its Chavkin's direction that hides the clear flaws of Hadestown, where Orpheus and Eurydice have no character arcs throughout the show despite being the the shows protagonists. Orpheus is simply charming, and Eurydice simply wants to be free of struggle. The later does have some emotional struggle, but it amounts nothing by the plots conclusion. The secondary couple of Hades and Persephone, actually do have character arcs, and should be the shows leading couple, but are relegated to secondary characters... simply because its an adaptation of "Orpheus and Eurydice". Tootsie on the other hand has the exact opposite problem where the book and score work despite a mediocre and boring direction by Scott Ellis. I think the argument they are making is similar to the Lion King vs Ragtime debate as Ragtime is the better musical on paper, but Lion King is the better production. They think Tootsie is the Ragtime, but as history shows Lion King will likely win.
My qualms with Hadestown are its producers, who I overheard discussing their awards campaign and competition in the lobby of the Kerr while I was purchasing tickets before it opened. They were openly trashing other shows, and were making the argument that Hadestown is high art and can't be judged, while every other musical that opened is commercial trash. It simply rubbed me the wrong way, and definitely clouded my judgment when I saw the show. It didn't help that the show increased their standard ticket prices post opening to $249. I honestly just don't want to reward greed. Tootsie and The Prom's producers may be just as bad, but I didn't experience it.
Updated On: 5/14/19 at 11:54 AM