At the end of the day it is down to personal choice. Whether it makes their voice stronger or not, I am sure people can lay claim to examples to support examples either way! But examples are not proof. There are some medical professionals who give opinions/"evidence" to support (but not prove categorically) either argument, but again no proof. What may possibly help one person in terms of their vocal benefits could be fatal for another (literally or in terms of the quality of their voice) but then that is down to them if they wish to risk it.
I am no fan of smoking, not for the health risks to the smoker as that is purely down to them and it is their fault if their health ultimately deteriorates and I really have no sympathy – I just hope smokers don’t start suing people and blaming people for their own habit later down the line. However, I have respect for those smokers who are mindful of non-smokers in terms of passive smoking, and those who are actively involved in not promoting it to younger people, especially if trying give up themselves.
Of course, it is an addiction so I wish smokers all the best if they DO truly want to give up but cannot. It is just those who have no desire to give up and then complain/try to sue later when some illness or other sets in.
My main issue with smoking though, is probably selfish (though arguably no more selfish than a smoker who insists on smoking to improve the strength of their voice while other non-smokers are around and taking their smoke second hand) is how a lot of smokers, especially heavy smokers, stink. Sitting next to someone who is clearly a smoker in the theatre, for instance, is dreadful and on a par with bad body odour or being the only person in the room to have eaten garlic. But then, it's their choice and we do not have to like it for them!
Updated On: 4/8/06 at 07:22 AM