Today, Mackintosh just confirmed that the remake of 'My Fair Lady' is not happening after all. He said, "it didn't happen due to various things with the rights and the studio." Honestly, I'm kind of glad because the original is a classic and even if Eliza does not end up with Freddy it's fine.
"I just wish Miss Saigon wasn't being remade, too"
I'm sure that myself and pretty much every other poster on this board would like to be pointed in the direction of the first Miss Saigon film that is being "remade."
I'd love to see a new film version of "Pygmalion" that goes back to Shaw's original stage play with its "Doll's House" style ending rather than the romantic one Shaw always hated. Benedict Cumberbatch would be a natural for Higgins. My dream cast though would feature Hugh Laurie as Higgins and Stephen Fry as Pickering.
I would love a Pygmalion remake, but I"m glad a redo of My Fair Lady died on the vine.
As for Miss Saigon, I think it lends itself to a film adaptation even more so than Les Miserables. I'm actually looking forward to that one (assuming it happens).
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
We certainly don't need a MY FAIR LADY remake but there are plenty of Actors who could do Higgins justice. And face it, Harrison was terrific but not many people even know who he is (except for that performance) these days.
And I agree Miss Saigon (in the right hands) could be an exciting movie. The combination of that music, the Love story and the history of the Viet Nam War lends itself to promising Cinema.
"The combination of that music, the Love story and the history of the Viet Nam War lends itself to promising Cinema."
I very much agree. Whenever I listen to the original cast recording I see far more cinematic shots in my head, rather than remembering what I saw onstage. Like during the "This Is the Hour" choral piece after Kim shoots Thuy I just see these wide sweeping shots showing statues and propaganda of Ho Chi Minh intercut with shots of Kim standing over Thuy's body. And the fall of Saigon sequence offers the opportunity to be absolutely thrilling on the screen.
I think "Miss Saigon" was just about the worst show I've ever seen. I saw it in London, with an understudy going on for Lea Salonga. The endless recitative, those lousy lyrics, the scenes which all seemed stolen from other (and vastly superior) musicals, the helicopter which seemed to exist just to top "Phantom"'s chandelier...I don't remember how it went over critically in NY, but it did run for a while so maybe there would be an audience for a film version. I doubt I'd be joining them.
I'd gladly see a remake of "Guys and Dolls" or"Man of La Mancha."
I would have loved to have seen Hugh Laurie as Higgens but I'm glad this isn't being remade.
"All our dreams can come true -- if we have the courage to pursue them." -- Walt Disney
We must have different Gods. My God said "do to others what you would have them do to you". Your God seems to have said "My Way or the Highway".
>>Completely agreed. Let's just hope that they shift the fall of Vietnam to its chronological position, where it always should have been.<<
I used to think that - sort of. But at last night's preview, the placement felt right. It is an Act 2 dramatic moment - and as staged last night - as part of the dream/nightmare - it made perfect sense. If its in Act 1 - even in a movie - there is no major moment prior to the denounement. After all, Sophie's Choice is shown at the end - not in the beginning. You are so much more invested in Kim in Act 2 - in seeing what she has gone through since the Fall of Saigon that you care more about the chaos and confusion and heartbreak. If it comes just after Last Night of the World - it just happens. You are not emotionally ready for it. So, it is not just the Act II spectacle - it is dramatically appropriate. Just my opinion.
I love Miss Saigon..and I am hopeful that this will finally take place. I don't see the reason for updating it though ..it's called Miss Saigon so it pretty much has to take place in VietNam...and themes of war are pretty universal. It could be very powerful regardless.
[I'm sure that myself and pretty much every other poster on this board would like to be pointed in the direction of the first Miss Saigon film that is being "remade."]
After seeing Miss Saigon in London, last night, which was excellent, I think Cameron Mackintosh would want to bring Saigon to Broadway first, before doing the film, having a Broadway production running, will add to its box office, like Phantom of the Opera did when the film came out.
Expect Miss Saigon on Broadway in the fall 2015/spring 2016.
I was excited about MY FAIR LADY since Emma Thompson wrote the screenplay and at one point they had Carey Mulligan as Eliza. I strongly dislike the original film so I'd have welcomed a remake, at the same time, I never for a second thought it'd actually see the light of day. I just don't see a marketplace for this kind of musical today.
"Some people can thrive and bloom living life in a living room, that's perfect for some people of one hundred and five. But I at least gotta try, when I think of all the sights that I gotta see, all the places I gotta play, all the things that I gotta be at"
Last year, I saw My Fair Lady on the big screen at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. My first time seeing the film since I was a kid. As a kid I fell madly in love with Audrey Hepburn's Eliza -- how could I not? -- I was a preteen boy who loved everything glamorous and slightly over the top, if you know what I mean. Rex Harrison, frankly, bored me at that time and I longed for moments when Audrey Hepburn returned to the screen. When I saw the film again last year, I was struck by what a brilliant film musical it was, how well it stood up today (unlike, frankly, the majority of film musicals), how lovely Audrey Hepburn loooked in those iconic moments like at the Ascott opening day, but how the film actually truly belonged to Rex Harrison, not Audrey Hepburn. The entire Dorothy Chandler Pavilion roared -- I mean roared -- with laughter at every Higgins bon mot he dropped. I was struck by not only what a funny, but intelligent and at times deeply sensitive portrayal he gave. Audrey, as lovely as she looked and as on-point as she was in certain scenes, could never quite keep up with Harrison. Even so, this one feels almost as perfect as a film musical could be. So glad they're not touching it -- even if Emma Thompson and other quality luminaries were to be involved.
I'm always completely divided as to whether or not I love or hate the original film. There are parts where it seems perfect, but others where it just seems sub-par or not right or something like that.
MAN OF LaMANCHA really needs a film that would do it justice. I think the play as it is is very movie-like in structure, and it's a pity the original film is so bad.