Showface said:
Because you are one person counting off the appearances of numerous different actors/ensemble members.
But I'm really good at counting. And, again, I only counted people who were obviously not white. Even if I miscounted a little, who cares? If it were 30% non-white, that would still be good, and it's definitely more than that.
I mean, I do to, but do you think that maybe the reason you feel the way you do about diversity onstage is because it doesn't really affect you, because maybe you are already well-represented?
No. I've never seen a Broadway show about a gay white atheist socialist male from the suburbs of Southern California.
Well, since we're talking about "Broadway", we should probably take into consideration where "Broadway" is located. It's located in one of the most diverse places in America. New York City is most assuredly not so overwhelmingly white.
That's a fair point. But I also don't think the pool of performing talent in New York is representative of the city as a whole. But I could be wrong.
Yes, this season is wonderfully diverse, but this is just one season. Shows will close, new shows will open, and so on and so on--will it continue to stay this wonderfully diverse? One can hope. And no, we are not overcompensating right now, like you seem to think that we've done (and yes, you did say: "If anything, we've over-compensated."..)
"If anything" in the sense that given the two extremes (viz. overcompensating and having a long way to go), overcompensating is closer to the truth. Not saying it is the truth.
As for the audience, what can you do? You can't make non-white people go to the theater, if they don't want to. Why is that even important or relevant?
"