“It shows you that theater wasn’t made for you," said Maddi, who is African-American. "And it shows you that, if you can’t get the parts that are written for you, what parts are you going to get?”
I find this to be a very interesting comment. This person, while a person of colour, is (as far as I know) likely not of Indian-type descent (i.e., it wasn't 'written for her'
. It seems to be perpetuating this interesting dynamic we have right now where there are apparently only two ethnicities: white and people of colour. White people can't play any person of colour role, but any person of colour can play any person of colour role regardless of their background and the background of the character.
Does an African American have more moral right to play an Indian character than a white person?
If there was genuinely someone who matched (or was close to) the ethnicity of the character (e.g., Indian/Paki background) and was the best fit/most talented AND THEN it STILL went to a white person, the situation would be a lot clearer and there should be very strong protests. But I'm not sure this situation is as simple.
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
Updated On: 2/8/18 at 04:46 PM