"I don't see him as wanting to be better by trying to be more white but generally wanting to improve himself through education."
But the key words left out of that sentence are "improve himself through white Western education."
We accept and adore The King & I because it's been around so long - nothing wrong there, it's just the appeal of the familiar; if the show were written today (as is), it would never make it to the workshop stage.
The modern version of this story would run something like: "Benevolent, wise, peaceful Asian monarch is beset on all sides by European powers demanding his ports for military purposes and his natural resources for commercial profit (a la Pacific Overtures).
While trying to deal with them through diplomacy, an aggressive repressed self-hating half-caste woman is appointed teacher to his court by the English Embassy. This woman has changed her name from Owens to Leonowens when she fled a charge of seducing her aboriginal students while in Australia.
She proceeds to harangue the King and his wives and children to abandon their traditional ways and be more like Westerners - repressed, over-clothed, monogamous, hypocritical.
One night, after a dinner for the British Embassy during which Anna has drunk far too much wine, she loses her inhibitions and attempts to seduce the King, who gently declines her offers. The next day, her sobriety, repressions, and shame return and she goes to the English ambassador and accuses the King of rape.
He, being the more evolved and "civilized" of the two, to protect what little reputation she has left, admits the charge and issues a formal apology, even though it puts him in the inferior position, diplomatically, with England.
Anna realizes too late what a terrible person she is, and - what? Commits suicide? Emigrates to America, vowing to start anew and carry on the King's tradition of wisdom and peace?"
You decide.
Updated On: 6/19/15 at 09:07 AM