"Handle it on a break or during the intermission."
So I need to sacrifice my ability to enjoy the show due to the distraction in order not to make a scene? As I said earlier in the thread: That's bull****.
Here are the problems we face:
1. Pre-show announcements - People show up late, people ignore them, people are used to hearing them so can easily tune them out or they are not delivered with a strong enough hand to be effective.
2. House staff - Their job is to seat people and end obvious distractions and distractions, most prominently of the legal kind (photos/video of copyrighted material). Most people know not to use their voices in the theater and therefore do not require reprimand. On the other hand, cellphones as a new technology do not have clear grandfathered in rules. Not only that but every person in the theater has one so we cannot expect the staff, regardless of how well trained or efficient, to be on top of every person's voice AND electronic devices.
3. Ticket prices - The article from the WSJ eludes to lower ticket prices possibly meaning a lower mannered audience, but in fact I think it is the opposite. Because theater has become an art form to be enjoyed by those with a large amount of expendable income (2 tickets @ $125 + Dinner @ $90 + Parking @ $30 + Tolls @ $10 = $380 for a date night at the theater), less people have the exposure needed to know how to properly behave. An example: My niece has sat at the table with my brother and his wife since she has been able to be upright. Since she has been able to eat solid food she eats exactly what they eat in a smaller portion. She therefore does not act up in restaurants because the way to behave in a dinner situation has been ingrained in her consciousness. This same principle can be applied to those who have and have not been exposed to theater which I believe is a direct result of the inaccessibility to reasonably priced tickets.
4. Instant Gratification - Like I said in my last post, the need for instant gratification and constant connection fuels the need of people to take their devices out during shows. We must also keep in mind that on "date nights" (Thurs-Sun), a good 20-40% of the audience is only there out of companionship to appease their significant other so that boredom welcomes the use of said devices. That coupled with people without the necessary ingrained theater etiquette leads us to the perdicament we have today.
On a whole other note, those chastising Patti need to realize that the coverage of the two verbal reamings she has delivered has generated a huge amount of discussion and hopefully self reflection by people both proficient AND lacking in theater etiquette. I'd make a strong bet that the majority of people in those two theaters learned a valuable lesson and the coverage has caused many more to do so by proxy.
EDIT: "If the person onstage yells at an audience member then they are being unprofessional."
There is no such thing as theater without an audience. It is a 2 part harmony and the professionalism of a person on stage should not be compromised do to the lack of etiquette of a person viewing them. If Ms. LuPone would like to make it her vendetta to weed out offenders like this then more power to her because in the mean time, for the above stated reasons, we are at a deadlock.
Updated On: 6/23/09 at 06:37 PM