Kad said: "JBroadway said: "If I can get a dirt cheap ticket to this, I’ll CONSIDER seeing it for 1 reason, and 1 reason only: Lynn Nottage. She is the only ray of hope that this project has, if they allow her any creative freedom, that is."
I had hoped that Nottage would mitigate the tone-deaf nature of this project, but that interview in the Times did not fill me with confidence.
NOTTAGEIt’s really hard to traffic in absolutes. Do I believe he was a pedophile? I don’t know that I can say one way or the other. I don’t think any of us can say with absolute certainty, because we’ve been presented with some information, but Michael Jackson is dead, he’s not in a position to defend himself. It does hurt my heart to think about the possibility that it could be true, and I pray that it isn’t true, and that’s all I can do. I’m not going to be a Michael apologist, but I can’t say 100 percent.
Michael Jackson Musical Creators: ‘We’re Not Judge and Jury’"
Agreed, and good points, but to me the even more telling subtext of that article was the (B.S.) assertion that regarding the latest furor over the allegations, the documentary, etc., and whether any of that would be addressed in the musical, they’ve had NO restrictions placed on them by the estate over what could or couldn’t be in the show (Ha!), but as to whether or not those areas would ultimately be included, all they could basically say was “Not yet.” Moving ahead with this project in such a manner is the absolute height of callous money-grubbing cynicism, and it undercuts whatever respect I had for these artists for anything else they’ve done in their careers up to this point.
Updated On: 10/10/19 at 01:00 PM