@Iris, yes the word is transparency. That's what's missing.
@Green, that transparency is missing in your scenario, and DW is complicit in that lack of transparency because they obviously made the deal, didn't disclose it and made affirmative representations to the contrary. This is not on the actors: actors for the most part (a) don't follow things like this-they are too busy getting in shape to perform- and (b) don't necessarily understand the nuances of all this because, well, this is not a part of their skill set. I don't think there is any sentiment here against the performers-that just seems like you projecting. Finally, there is a potentially really bad outcome here for DW if the IRS thinks the transaction is private inurement, which is not impossible. Let's hope not but that would blow up DW and no one wants that. I do think, however, as I said above, that this could also affect fundraising in the future, and I would not be surprised to see some shift at the top when all is said and done.