Because everything I've read, including the Barnes review I quoted, has implied they felt the show was dated. I never said I knew or I thought it was, I just said that I think that's how many saw it. Is that hard for you to comprehend?
EVERYTHING is hard for A8 to comprehend - because he has no intention of listening to anyone else's ideas ever.
Trust me: blocking him was one of the best choices I ever made on this board. Threads are much more pleasant now.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Yet you took the trouble to read and respond to my thoughts on Hamilton.
Why, I have no idea.
I'm grateful you blocked me, though.
I wish more people would do the same!
As for the subject of this thread, I saw a wonderful production of On the Town at Paper Mill a few years ago that, unlike this one, got it right. But I don't know if it would have fared any better on Broadway than previous revivals or the present one. The public just doesn't seem to be interested in the piece.
^When was Papermill's production? Do you remember who was in it?
I liked the current revival, but not as much as I anticipated. I remember really enjoying the version that was in Central Park in the 90s. The only time I laughed at Jackie Hoffman was when she was playing the cabaret singer.
I would definitely go back to see it again if given the opportunity.
Hey Dottie!
Did your colleagues enjoy the cake even though your cat decided to sit on it? ~GuyfromGermany
I thought I had him blocked as well but appeared the other day. Not sure if something happened with settings but had to add him again. One can only look at so much negativity.
"I hope your Fanny is bigger than my Peter."
Mary Martin to Ezio Pinza opening night of Fanny.
LOL! Why would someone like this want to post here?
"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."
"I don't understand this. Nearly 500 performances was still seen as a big hit by the time On the Town premiered."
462 performances definitely was a hit, but here are the longer runs of other shows from the same time (On The Town opened December 1944):
Oklahoma, March 1943 - 2,212 performances Ziegfeld Follies of 1943, April 1943 - 553 performances One Touch of Venus, October 1943 - 567 performances Carmen Jones, December 1943 - 503 performances Follow The Girls, April 1944 - 888 performances Song of Norway, April 1944 - 860 performances Bloomer Girl, October 1944 - 654 performances Up In Central Park, January 1945 - 504 performances Carousel, April 1945 - 890 performances The Red Mill (revival), October 1945 - 531 performances Call Me Mister, April 1946 - 734 performances Annie Get your Gun, May 1946 - 1,147 performances
Not making any particular point, except that some shows that were more (maybe only slightly more) successful than On The Town are never revived now, and are almost entirely forgotten. For some reason (perhaps because of the popular movie), producers believe that On The Town is a good candidate for a financially successful revival (despite all evidence to the contrary).
The same thing happens with Jesus Christ Superstar, too.
"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."
Newintown--I would suggest both OTT and JCS (if we can lump them together,) have scores that have endeared and that surely is one of the reasons they are revived. (I know that's probably obvious, but since you didn't mention it :P )
I found this production much more rewarding than the '71 revival. As much as I admired Ron Field, Bergasse's choreography is more dynamic and the casting is more appropriate. Bernadette Peters was no more a Hildy than Donna McKechnie was an Ivy and only Remak Ramsay stood out among the leading men. I agree that some of the sexiness is overplayed in this production to diminishing comic returns but it has a big heart and innate energy the '71 revival lacked.
@jv92 That criticism of Into the Woods is spectacular. I can only imagine, "Can we please get these characters out of these f#cking woods? All the leaves and sh!t."
"Contentment, it seems, simply happens. It appears accompanied by no bravos and no tears."
Ron Husmann was wonderful in the '71 production, as was Bernadette Peters. In fact, the entire cast was superior to the current one.
There was plenty of energy in that production. And style. But there's a big difference between energy and pushing too hard, as there is between good taste and a lack thereof.
Convinced my basic friend to see this next week YAY. Has anyone tried the TodayTix lottery? I figured since the theater is 35% full it might just be better to try the lottery... Let me know!! :)
"See that poster on the wall? Rocky Marciano." - Andy Karl as Rocky in 'ROCKY'
She doesn't have the best taste in Broadway... I had to beg her to see Violet and Bridges and she pretended to hate Bridges. I was like.. Kelli O'Hara is a legend.
She also hated Bonnie and Clyde... WTF.
"See that poster on the wall? Rocky Marciano." - Andy Karl as Rocky in 'ROCKY'
Oh. So you insult a "friend" because their tastes don't coincide with yours. You must be a joy to be around, considering you have only one person to beg for theater company. Why not just go to shows alone; it'll be much more fun, and apparently plenty of people here do it.