Would I be correct in saying THE GREAT COMET would be ineligible (having debuted during a previous period of eligibility)?
FUN HOME, THE FLICK and MR. BURNS all seemed to make a hell of a mark this year and would all be worthy recipients in my eyes. And Richard Nelson winning for REGULAR SINGING could also be viewed as a win for the Apple Family plays as a whole, which wouldn't be bad either. Off-Broadway really had a bounty of riches for original works this year! BAD JEWS also might make the shortlist, though it strikes me as too much a promising-young-playwright piece than a Pulitzer-winner.
One thing I try to look for when thinking about what might be on their shortlist: returning authors. They do sometimes like to give the award to someone they've shortlisted in the past.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.