okay, when in the show does it show Angel and Collins going at it? I didn't really see that much of a difference between the show and movie in context of their going at it...
They are a bit delusional and I thought perhaps there was something familiar about the way they selectively used information to start a war and the way you view the Rent Movie.
Take a piece here, and piece there, distort it at a certain angle, and voila - Saddam has nuclear weapons and/or Rent is homophonic.
Angel and Collins are portrayed differently than Joanne and Maureen because...
THEY ARE A DIFFERENT COUPLE!!
And it just so happens that Maureen and Joanne have a more sex-oriented relationship.
Angel and Collins' relationship is ABOVE that, i.e. it is DEEPER, i.e. you have nothing to complain about!
If their relationship in the movie consisted only of hot sex, THINK ABOUT IT! Wouldn't you be complaining that there was no depth to the relationship? That they were suggesting that two men couldn't have a meaningful relationship?
If you want to see gay ACTION, I'm sure there are PLENTY of movies that will accomidate you. It just so happens that this one has decided to to show a gay RELATIONSHIP. If that bothers you, move on!
If after Art sees the film he still has a gripe about Angel and Collins, then we'll talk. But till then it's a bit moot, cause he's making all sorts of assumptions.
I think it goes without saying that NO ONE I have worked with on the film is even a little bit homophobic, and trust me, that's something about which I would be very aware.
It's very interesting to see this conversation unfold, though.
Congratulations on finding ONE other person who agrees with you. That does not make you vindicated. It means there is one other person out there who agrees with your position. THAT'S ALL. How many papers and reviews did you have to read before you found the ONLY ONE that saw things fom your uninformed point of view?
And, you shouldn't speak of a show, or a movie that you haven't seen. That's just stupid. So, shut your pie hole.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
Same difference. He hasn't seen the stage play, so he's shooting off his big yap without being fully informed.
And by the time he does see the movie, he's already talked himself into being angry with it.
I still think he needs to shut his (humble) pie hole.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
.... even though I'm sure the lovely art's opinions won't change when he *does* see the movie, this isn't worth much more than laughter to me until he does.
Anti-gay shredder, was it? It's all about the catch phrases, y'all.
Please forgive me if this has been addressed, but this assertion is so ludicrous that I could not read every post.
Art, would you be as upset if, in your OPINION, the male-male relationship was "sexed-up" while the female-female relationship was, in your OPINION, watered down?
"I am open, and I am willing,
For to be hopeless would seem so strange.
It dishonors those who go before us,
So lift me up to the light of change."
Holly Near
If that happened, I firmly believe Art2 would be bashing the film for now showing a deeper, loving, male/male relationship and only focusing on the stereotype of gay men wanting sex.
I don't think there is any scenario where he would be satisfied with the end-product.
Someone could so easily turn this against Art and call it sexism that he's upset about the male-male relationship, but probably wouldn't be as up in arms if the feeling were that the female-female relationship were dimished; in that he seems to be more interested in the gay males than he is in the gay females. And that be silly. But, it would be silly because his starting point is so far off-base; you just go farther. The Rent creators are homphobic, art? Then you're sexist. And if that's preposterous, so is your assumption about this movie.