The least successful of the 2.0 Harold Hills, in my opinion, though he worked hard, clearly. He didn't have the necessary size and bravura showmanship. He was like the talented boy in high school who got the role because ... he was the talented boy in the high school. I can't fault the quality of his work, merely his appropriateness for the unique charismatic demands of Hill. His "Trouble" I recall, lacking a galvanizing snake-oil selling confidence. Not everyone can play everything, even if the results are earnest and impressive. I can't imagine today paying $146 to see him stretch in that role.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling