Posted: 7/26/09 at 4:40pm
SISTER ACT- what changes should be made between London and Broadway — Page 4
Posted: 7/26/09 at 8:59pm
I agree with the consensus that "Fabulous, Baby!" is the best song in the score. Ironically, it was cut in Atlanta. The song that replaced it ("Too Much To Live For") was set in the police station and basically put forth why Deloris was making the decision to protect herself by going into the convent.
It was a nice enough number, but "Fabulous, Baby!" works much better in establishing Deloris's desire for fame (which is much more relative to the character with a younger actress like Miller in the role.)
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
Updated On: 7/28/09 at 08:59 PM
Posted: 7/27/09 at 6:42am
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:03am
The CD cant convey a lot of the visuals that go with some of the numbers and they will sound strange if the show hasn't been seen
This Bobby poster is a pretty opinionated person who has only listened to the CD and never seen the show.
Just what you expect from this board.
Updated On: 7/27/09 at 07:03 AM
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:14am
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:31am
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:34am
Thought not.
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:37am
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:48am
I have seen this twice and there are standout performances from the "3 Nuns" - Katie Rowley Jones, Claire Greenway and Julia Sutton. The hoodlums would probably better played by Americans. I think you would find the creative team are extremely happy with the vast majority of the cast.
The ensemble are also excellent.
It remains to be seen if a Broadway cast would be "stronger" - game on!
Posted: 7/27/09 at 7:59am
Posted: 7/27/09 at 8:41am
Im lost for words!
Posted: 7/27/09 at 8:47am
So let me ask you, have you seen the show? Have you heard any of the music? I'm guessing you probably haven't. So you can't judge this show.
Also you obviously haven't seen Spiderman, The Addams Family, or The Notebook. You can not say these shows are stupid because you know nothing about them, who knows they could be great shows. So get the stick out of your @$$ and see a show before you judge it.
Posted: 7/27/09 at 10:10am
Like I said, this Bobby guy and the original poster have very little knowledge on this and just come over as being damn right ignorant.
Updated On: 7/27/09 at 10:10 AM
Posted: 7/27/09 at 11:43am
I think you can think an IDEA won't work...but how can you judge a production that doesn't exist yet?
Posted: 7/27/09 at 12:23pm
The London Palladium is huge and the huge sets look fabulous on its huge stage. As for the huge cast, well, they can sing the pants off many a Broadway show I've seen in the last few years.
Updated On: 7/27/09 at 12:23 PM
Posted: 7/27/09 at 12:39pm
Yes Bobbybooby, c'mon - respond to Fairygodmother's challenge.
The West End cast has a number of performers who will appeal to British audiences precisely because British sensibilities are very different from American ones: perceptive and subtle production teams know how to bridge the gap, crass and ignorant ones do not.
Posted: 7/27/09 at 12:43pm
jk.
Posted: 7/27/09 at 5:12pm
Posted: 7/27/09 at 5:26pm
Posted: 7/27/09 at 5:34pm
Posted: 7/28/09 at 4:05am
There is a reason that, in Disney, the older, softer characters have been dominated by Angela Lansbury.......she "feels" right. For the same reason they ended up with an American in the Deloris role. Brits find the "hubris" needed difficult. For the opposite reason, I think you might find an American Superior and/or Mary Patrick hard to pull off.
Also, character actresses who are a "name" and of sufficient age (Sheila's 76!) and gravitas don't always want to sign up to 12 months of 8 shows a week - they approached several big names who wouldn't commit.
Lets not argue - it's not as though they'll ask our opinion when casting!
Remember ALL the factors - you have to look right, sing/sound right, get the character right, move well, be the right size/shape, contribute to the ensemble singing, have the stamina to do 8 shows a week, learn quickly and react to changes, and not be too expensive! (They're not on big bucks!) It's a wonder shows like this ever get cast at all!
Posted: 7/28/09 at 10:12am
In my opinion, it seems like Broadway is desperately trying to get new shows in the theatres, but there's very little originality. So why not turn a movie or tv show into a Broadway show? (I'm hoping you can sense my sarcasm here) These shows may turn out to be great and rake in a lot of dough...great. I'm saying that we need some original shows...
Mark E...I would rather have Broadway try an original piece (and even have it flop) than create a show based off a movie...it's tired.
Drunk Chita Rivera...grow up. Seriously..."get ths stick out of your a$$"??? Wow...can't believe you speak to people like that, just for voicing their opinion (which...correct me if I'm wrong, is the point of this board!). It's actually sad...
I have no clue who Bobby is, nor am I the original poster. Not that it matters, but I've been on this board for a while now, but for some reason could not log in, so I had to create a new account, hence the "swing" status.
And Mama...just because I have an opinion, I'm ignorant? Interesting. So are you saying that if someone doesn't agree with your opinion, they're ignorant? I hope not. I hope I'm misunderstanding you.
Updated On: 7/28/09 at 10:12 AM
Posted: 7/28/09 at 11:46am
They weren't voicing their opinion. They were criticizing a show that haven't seen and shows no one has seen. If they had seen the shows then they would be perfectly reasonable but they haven't.
Posted: 7/28/09 at 12:35pm
I agree there are some great original musicals about (like Drowsy) but don't forget a lot of great shows, as much as they may seem it, arn't truely original (Gypsy, Grey Gardens, Rent being 3 examples).
Out of the 60 or so musicals I have seen, there are VERY few that don't have existing source material.
Posted: 7/28/09 at 1:18pm
Make sure you hear this.
BROADWAY HAS BEEN BASED ON OTHER THINGS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME. THEATRE IS ADAPTIVE & ORIGINAL SHOWS ARE FEW AND FAR BETWEEN.
BroadwayWorld TV