SMASH Hits Moral Low — Page 3

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#51

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:30pm

They aren't using Larsen's likeness or story -- it is just a parallel/similarity. (A strong similarity, granted.)

And taking advantage of a death for profit is hardly unique.

If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it? These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.

#52

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:31pm

Quite the mix of this year's real nominees and some old favorites.

#53

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:34pm

Who would cast Osnes in OLIVER?

If it's a parallel story how is it honoring Larsen?

Is BEAUTY QUEEN a musical of BEAUTY QUEEN OF LINEA?
Id see Vicky Clarke in that!

And Borle mentioned PIPPIN.
Where's Petunia's pic for that?
My head is spinning.

#54

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:34pm

"Life rights" actually exist? I thought that was something they just made up for 30 ROCK.

#55

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:40pm

I can't think of a single example of any other TV show or script that... I can't think of a collection of words or a phrase that captures the essence of what they did, since nobody's done it before, but a script that is based on a true story. I guess you could say.

Never.

Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none

#56

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:43pm

And just to get the Smash schedule straight, we have another episode on Saturday 5/11 and then won't see it again until the final 5/26? Way to screw this show over even more NBC!!

Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco. Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!

#57

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 12:51pm

^Yes because they lumped the episodes involving the Tony Awards together. We'll see nominations and the winners in the same night.

#58

SMASH Hits Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:01pm

I really can't understand the wailing and teeth gnashing. Were we similarly outraged on behalf of Michael Crawford when Smash hired Sean Hayes to mock his behavior during DANCE OF THE VAMPIRES? Or for Sutton Foster when a watered-down version of her THOROUGHLY MODERN MILLIE experience became 40% of Karen Cartwright's arc last season? What should Julie Taymor sue over first: the Smash plotline where a high-flying, aerobatic female archetype threatens to become the dominant character in her show, or the Smash plotline where a director gets publicly fired and threatens to get litigious over his contributions remaining in the show? Should the estate of Bob Fosse be worried that Smash tried to hide the fact that they stole the character of Joe Gideon by turning him PG-13 and giving him an English accent? Do the producers of Wildhorn's DRACULA have legal standing to go after Smash because Bombshell turned a bit of accidental nudity into a marketing point? Is Ben Sprecher serving legal papers to Eileen Rand this morning for appropriating REBECCA's production woes for Bombshell? Is Sondheim owed royalties because Smash turned Franklin Shepard, Inc., into a book scene last week without credit? Should Theresa Rebeck's scarves sue for slander???

If none of these were "moral lows", how are we supposed to be upset at a rather frank retelling of the one of the most interesting theatre stories of the past 30 years: the Larson/RENT phenomenon? What is there to be upset about? Is it the reminder that, yes, producers did exploit the death of Jonathan Larson to bring more attention to their show, and, yes, the loss of Larson was felt keenly by a cast that probably should not have been performing his work right away but may have experienced a tremendous catharsis while doing so? None of this was Smash's doing.

More importantly, is there some sort of mailing list I can join so I can know in advance which of Smash's parables I need to feign mock indignation about? I'm a little unsure how I'm supposed to react to the Kristin/Idina Tony feud storyline we are building to...

Also I sincerely hope this is the most number of words I ever write in defense of Snatch (auto-correct typo and it's staying).

#59

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:02pm

Some other odd things about the possible Tony nom boards:

Eileen says not to worry about Hit List because it won't be transferring, and yet they have Karen't picture up for Best Actress. If they bothered to put her up, why wasn't The Diva put up under Featured Actress?

Tom mentions Drood and Pippin, two real shows that happened this season. Chita is pictured for Drood, but Patina is nominated for House of Flowers, I guess in the Diahann Carroll role. Why not nominate her for Pippin?

Even though Imitation of Life is closing they don't think anyone will be nominated from it, yet they think Ivy will be nominated for Liaisons, which only played one week?

Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco. Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!

#60

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:07pm

hyperbole, you forgot that Flaherty/Ahrens should be suing over the Borle/Messing characters.

If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.

#61

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:37pm

So many of you can't even spell "Larson" correctly.

"This thread reads like a series of White House memos." — Mister Matt

#62

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:45pm

"So many of you can't even spell "Larson" correctly."

Thank you Kristin Chenoweth

If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.

#63

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 1:50pm

Johnithin Larsen is not even hear to defend himslef that he didn't die from a car. #tommoraw4me

Twitter @NamoInExile Instagram none

#64

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 2:06pm

I wouldn't mind Osnes playing Nancy in Oliver!

#65

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 2:38pm

I have not been this devastated since Lady Sybil's death.
I cannot imagine a life without Smash.
My only quibble with this episode was that they did not find some way to get Daphne Rubin-Vega up on the stage to sing for the first performance after Kyle died.

PEACE.

#66

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 3:11pm

Maybe she will at the Joe's Pub benefit they'll have next season to raise money for bisexual power bottom book writers of sung through musicals.

#67

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 3:31pm

Hyperbole raises an interesting point. I had wondered multiple times if Smash was a roman a clef, with characters standing in for real Broadway people. But Hyperbole points out that it's much more of a collage, with every moment lifted from Broadway trivia and history and woven together.

It's not a great drama or a great soap. I mainly enjoy it for the songs and for "spot the historical reference." For instance, Hyperbole's assertion that the Sean Hayes arc was a reference to Michael Crawford and "Dance of the Vampires" makes perfect sense, but the show itself was a pastiche of the infinite rewrites and tonal shifts of "Candide," while Hayes's character seems to be an analogue of comedian turned Broadway regular Martin Short. It's a cut-and-paste method that can be fascinating or simply alienating from moment to moment.

#68

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 3:33pm

Whizzer - exactly and on Memorial Day weekend also when people are out and about during the holiday weekend.

#69

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 3:37pm

"benefit they'll have next season to raise money for bisexual power bottom"

How do you know he was a bottom? Kurt and Blaine on Glee both want the audience to believe they are tops.

If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.

#70

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 4:45pm

What about the similarity of Jimmy and Kyle to Pasek and Paul?
Up and coming songwriters, one gay, one straight?
And P&P even wrote some of their songs.

I take SMASH as entertainment and try to overlook the gaffes, but sometimes it's too much, why would Anagelica have to tell Tom that PIPPIN is a revival?

#71

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 4:48pm

I don't have anything positive to say about last night's episode. There are just too many problems to list.

#72

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 5:52pm

I agree with you wholeheartedly!!!!

#73

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 5:55pm

CPD- In fairness to Tom about the Pippin/Drood comment, he responded that he worried about them competing with him for Best Director.

Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco. Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!

#74

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 9:05pm

Ah, that he did.

#75

SMASH Hit's Moral Low

Posted: 5/5/13 at 11:21pm

To Namo's point:

Law and Order bases plots on real events all the time -- sometimes specific enough that you can very easily draw the exact parallel and figure out exactly who they're (loosely) fictionalizing. Like that recent SVU episode that was so clearly about Chris Brown and Rihanna that one of the characters made a joke about it. But they acknowledge that the script was based on a true story, or inspired by true events, or whatever phrase they wanted to choose. And what they did instead comes off like they thought nobody would notice that they were claiming to have made up something that is a tragic, but like or or not, legendary part of American theatre history. Sure, lots of "made up" plotlines are inspired by other things. But with something THAT iconic, and parallels THAT exact, Smash had a responsibility to be more honest and respectful than it was. IMO.

(And, with, say, Law and Order, they -- usually -- adapt enough that the events aren't being told so verbatim that they actually don't even make sense in context. Like Smash went so far as to include a chairs-and-music-stands reading of Hit List just to bash you over the head with the fact that it was Rent. Why did the actors need music stands? They've been in previews already and they are clearly off book.)

A work of art is an invitation to love.

Updated On: 5/10/13 at 11:21 PM

← Back to Message Board

View all Videos

Tickets From $59

Tickets From $71

Tickets From $95