Posted: 6/13/18 at 1:17pm
I stand corrected. There were some, very minimal, references to Chaz (Cher complains to Sonny that the demanding work schedule he's concocted is keeping her from having time with her kid, for example). But these references occupy no more than a minute or two at best of the entire show's long running time. If there's time for entire scenes that revolve around Lucille Ball or Phil Spector or The Dave Clark Five, then there should be time in The Cher Show to focus at least a bit on her relationship with her children (especially her relationship with Chaz, perhaps, because he is a public figure and the difficulties Cher surmounted in accepting her child's gender reassignment could have provided some useful lessons to those members of the audience who haven't confronted the issue directly).
The book does emphasize some of the sacrifices that fame and superstardom entail, but primarily in terms of its impact on her relationships with men. Not much is made of how it impacted her relationship with her kids. But perhaps it was a foregone conclusion that the show would not go "there." As Elijah once pointed out:
‘Superstars are a difficult and unique breed. You have to be superficial to be a mega celebrity, you have to be… but who you are behind closed doors is really up you, there’s no cameras there.
‘Usually when there’s fame, there’s also brand of some sort, there’s also revenue. So whatever needs to be done to serve the generating of that revenue takes priority. I think that’s too big for anyone (famous) to escape.’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2551939/Cher-never-congratulated-marriage-Elijah-Blue-reveals-rift-famous-mother-recovery-heroin-addiction-explosive-new-interview.html
The Cher Show is intended as pure entertainment. Comfort food is harder to enjoy when it includes unknown ingredients that challenge the tastebuds.
Updated On: 6/13/18 at 01:17 PM