EL OH EL
But did HE know all the facts at the time? According to the man himself, he did. If he didn't and just took that time at Rikers for sh*ts and grins, then he's got even deeper issues, I guess.
I've seen 15 year old girls that easily looked *18*. Did she lie about her age? No, it would seem that she didn't. I don't think that part is in dispute, despite how many people seem to be holding tight to that one. If he was set up and trapped, then it would be a different story. But there is nothing that suggests that to be the case. And you know that.
When was the last time you carded someone you slept with? Never. But I've never met a sex partner under the circumstances that Barbour met the girl who pressed charges.
What is the difference between having sex with a girl who is 15 years and 364 days old, and with having sex with her on her 16th birthday? Provided that 16 is the age of consent in your scenario, then the difference is that that 16 year old can consent to sex with an adult and a fifteen year old can't. It's still disgusting either way. What grown person without serious issues would want to f@ck a sixteen year old? What's the point of this question, anyway? Are you suggesting that because consent laws are imperfect and arbitrary, that there should be none? That a man in his 30s shouldn't be expected to know better?
Again, what he did was clearly wrong, and he paid for it, but it's unfair to lump him in with pedophiles who seek to have sex with prepubescent children. I don't think anyone (except maybe nomdeplume, whose posts are best just ignored) is doing that.
Why do you end by saying it was "clearly" wrong, when everything you said beforehand was clearly an attempt to make it less clear?
Did you even read this thread?
Updated On: 8/20/11 at 08:58 PM