TheatreFan4 said: "joevitus said: "
What? Are the jokes in the show itself not good enoughor something? Do you insist on turning stagings of The Sound of Music into Sing-A-Long occasions?"
If Sound of Music had a near 50 year history of sing-a-longs in their stagings? Yeah... kinda.
Rocky Horror has call backs. It just does, attempting chastise people for it andcurtail it at this point is INSANE behavior. As if they're doing something wrong? Get over yourself, not every show is for you. If you are in the market for Rocky Horror then you are in the market for ROCKY HORROR and all that entails. If you don't like that, then don't go."
So no one is ever supposed to get the chance to enjoy a well-written show on its own terms because audiences have to make it all about themselves when it comes to Every. Single. Production? That's just absurd.
You're talking to a long-standing fan of the material. I actually experienced audience participation when it was good, and I enjoyed it. The midnight showings in the 70's and 80's were a unique experience I wouldn't trade for anything--and I was calling out lines, throwing rice and flicking on my Bic lighter, rushing to the foot of the screen to do the Time Warp, and tossing toilet paper along with everyone else.
But that audiences shouldn't ever get a chance to just see a production of the show as opposed to the audience participation stuff is nonsense. I also think this hems directors in--they feel compelled to follow certain timing or staging moments because they know--"Here comes X line. Can't do anything different because the audience is going to scream X at that moment anyway." Reserve that stuff for midnight showings of the movie, or let there be specific performances of the show reserved for audience participation, with the bulk of the performances free from it. It's so frustrating for this play get buried underneath what is mostly crap now anyway. It is strong enough to entertain on its own.
Updated On: 3/24/26 at 12:17 AM