"Of course they have feelings...but having to go on in the place of the actor is part of the job. I meant that the friend or family member of an u/s is being unrealistic if they are hurt to "hear" that some audience members are disappointed. " For starters, there's nothing unrealistic about feeling hurt when hearing an audience vocally express disappointment when a loved one's name is being announced. I completely agree, however, that someone loudly saying "That's my son!" is
way out of line. I don't know how you can deny her her hurt, though. It may be unrealistic, but these things are not so easily controllable. Besides, first you said :
"I'm sure the understudy does NOT get personally affected by any reaction (though I don't ever remember hearing one); they KNOW they are the understudy and that they only get to perform when necessary." I can tell you there that you're dead wrong. It absolutely does affect them. It is very hurtful to hear that kind of negative reaction, from hundreds of people, to your name. It's a hurt that happens on a very primal level. They suck it up and go on, of course, but understanding that it's part of the job doesn't lessen the hurt of that reaction of disapproval.
My all-time favorite understudy situation was
Chicago, when Uta Lemperer was Velma. Mamie Duncan-Gibbs was her understudy, and was on vacation. Nancy Hess was the standby, and had been released as the show was well underway.
Lemperer left mid-show. Nancy Hess was sitting at home, feet up, watching a football game, when she got the call. She leapt into a cab, but the curtain had to be rung down for fifteen minutes. Velma's next appearance in the show was "I Can't Do It Alone". She brought down the house. I'd always wondered if she had warmed up in the cab on her way to the theater.
eta: I completely agree with Broadwayguy12's post, and I don't know a single understudy who has felt they were putting their career on hold. It's a stepping stone as well as a learning process.
Updated On: 5/3/10 at 03:45 PM