#26
Posted: 11/9/07 at 10:01am
There is no need to remake it -- jumping on the bandwagon here, I guess. The movie is beautifully shot, the soundtrack is top-notch, and even with the dubbed voices for certain actors (or simply certain songs) the performances are perfection. I sometimes even wonder if a Broadway revival would fly well. Sure, there'd be some significant early buzz but this film is so well-known and so admired, a revival at this point will only be asking to be compared. It's frankly down to the tourists thinking, "Why pay $100+ to see a revival of a musical when I can rent the classic movie for $6?"
I would love to be proven wrong here. I am working National Ballet of Canada and they just had their first night of "West Side Story Suite" where they showcased "Prologue", "Something's Coming", "Dance at the Gym", "Cool", "America" (the stage "ladies" version), "The Rumble", and a re-imagined staging of "Somewhere". Several moments, though particularly the Mambo and "Cool", I got the full-body chills and admit to being a little teary. The energy on that stage is amazing. It doesn't matter if this is just some musical from an era that released warhorses like "The Music Man" (wondering when the guns are coming for this?). The music is still one of the best scores ever written for the Broadway stage and the movement/dance still seems to have stayed in its own class. There is still something very contemporary about this piece.
And another thought... WEST SIDE STORY came out of a longing for Jerome Robbins to update ROMEO AND JULIET. WEST SIDE STORY is exactly what it is -- a 1950s interpretation of a classic story. Unless someone can make an uber creative, not-too-drastic update to this piece without making it utterly laughable, go back and adapt and make a new version of ROMEO AND JULIET. Or, here's an idea: be creative and write something new. Don't be like dear Mr. Lurhmann who went, "Look! I kept the text and put the whole thing in the streets on 1996 Italy! Look, it still works! Aren't I brilliant?"
I would love to be proven wrong here. I am working National Ballet of Canada and they just had their first night of "West Side Story Suite" where they showcased "Prologue", "Something's Coming", "Dance at the Gym", "Cool", "America" (the stage "ladies" version), "The Rumble", and a re-imagined staging of "Somewhere". Several moments, though particularly the Mambo and "Cool", I got the full-body chills and admit to being a little teary. The energy on that stage is amazing. It doesn't matter if this is just some musical from an era that released warhorses like "The Music Man" (wondering when the guns are coming for this?). The music is still one of the best scores ever written for the Broadway stage and the movement/dance still seems to have stayed in its own class. There is still something very contemporary about this piece.
And another thought... WEST SIDE STORY came out of a longing for Jerome Robbins to update ROMEO AND JULIET. WEST SIDE STORY is exactly what it is -- a 1950s interpretation of a classic story. Unless someone can make an uber creative, not-too-drastic update to this piece without making it utterly laughable, go back and adapt and make a new version of ROMEO AND JULIET. Or, here's an idea: be creative and write something new. Don't be like dear Mr. Lurhmann who went, "Look! I kept the text and put the whole thing in the streets on 1996 Italy! Look, it still works! Aren't I brilliant?"