I think JayG has an excellent point, but only his point regarding the editorial choices on BWW (where choice 'news' headlines include BWW Personality Quiz: What Kind of a Broadway Ticket Buyer Are You? and So Fetch! BWW Readers Want Musical Versions of MEAN GIRLS, THE BREAKFAST CLUB and More High School Classics.)
The HAMILTON and Lin-Manuel fan community (which I would always groups as a second phenomenon from cultural and critical luminaries championing a show as 'fan communities' often cross the line for me into obsessiveness and hyperbolic desperation regarding their show of choice - as in IF/THEN or HEATHERS or, to a lesser extent, NEWSIES) have been fairly reasonable and respectful with their passion. Frankly, I think that comes from Miranda himself, since he has engaged with them in a constantly respectful tone. He doesn't look down on his audience; he identifies with and seeks to inspire them. His frequent tweets about shows that inspired him, LES MIS and A CHORUS LINE and the like, show off a level of obsessive fandom that his die-hards would obviously sympathize. However, he's made good: he used his obsessions and honed his skills with them to give back to the generations after him what he was given. That's about as excellent a use of the mysterious-to-me fanaticism that some people just have with these things. He also engages with them where they live, or at least much closer than other creative-types: his post on tumblr, asking tumblr users respectfully to avoid posting or seeking bootlegs, was as far as I know unprecedented and (unlike JRB, who comes off as having to **** down everyone's throats from his superior intellectual and artistic position) respecting of everyone's impulses while also enlightening to his own and those of the victims of bootlegging in his company. I think there is a lot to admire about Miranda, and always look forward to following him on twitter or seeing/hearing him interviewed.
Just not when it's excerpted into five different BWW EXCLUSIVE headlines for traffic clicks.
Words don't deserve that kind of malarkey. They're innocent, neutral, precise, standing for this, describing that, meaning the other, so if you look after them you can build bridges across incomprehension and chaos. But when they get their corners knocked off, they're no good anymore…I don't think writers are sacred, but words are. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.