"The Phantom of the Opera/Cats/Les Miserables (ushered in the synth-rock opera era, also noteworthy for concentrating on the show itself and not about who was in the cast, started the advertising movement where the logo was most important)"
Actually Hal Prince had LONG before worked from the philosophy that THE SHOW was the star... not the actor/s involved.
WEST SIDE STORY wasn't about Larry Kert or Carol Lawrence
CABARET wasn't about Jill Hayworth
and FIDDLER ON THE ROOF survived well after Mostel left.
Also, the importance of logo was only a facet of the marketing revolution. How those shows changed MERCHANDISING was also astonishing.. they slapped those logos on everything from mugs to suppositories!
They had people lining up to PAY to advertise the show.
Those Cameron Macintosh shows aimed at a GLOBAL audience... and got 'em! That is why I too believe they actually the changed the face of Broadway.
""The Phantom of the Opera/Cats/Les Miserables (ushered in the synth-rock opera era, also noteworthy for concentrating on the show itself and not about who was in the cast, started the advertising movement where the logo was most important)" "
Would you agree that the show that possibly pioneered that era was Jesus Christ Superstar?
How will 13 CHANGE or impact anything? Whether some of its actors will go on to other things is yet to be seen....and still that doesn't mean they will affect anything. I'm sure some of them will get other jobs at some point in their careers...but I wouldn't be suprised if some of them decide the heartbreak of theater is not worth it.
I doubt you can say it made ANY sort of real impact since so few people actaully saw it.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
i hate to go all "old school" on this thread but I think we gotta give a big prize to "Porgy & Bess." Then, I'd say (for good or bad, depending on what you dig) "Oklahoma," "Rent," "Cats," "Company," "Hair," "West Side Story," "Showboat," "Cradle Will Rock," "A Chorus Line," "Cabaret." There are many more for various reasons, but I believe those are some of the biggies.
13 did change broadway by being the first cast of all teens, YOUNG teens, 13 age range... even the band
obviously that has made history, whether you like the show or not
PianoLin, being a pioneer does not mean they changed Broadway. And making history does not mean it changed Broadway either. It has yet to be seen if 13 really did influence anything, considering it's abysmal performance I don't think many shows will be following suite.
Apparently "Allegro" was highly influential, led to the smooth transitions of sets etc.. (According to that Sondheim+Frank Rich interview).
oh but you wait.. in due time you will see its effects... more shows geared towards tweens, younger casts... just in due time
and by making history, i do think that changes broadway
It will only change Broadway if any other shows follow suit. If it goes by in a blip and no other shows follow its lead? Then it hasn't changed Broadway.
Can someone actually tell me HOW Wicked has changed Broadway? I'm especially curious how Wicked can be on somebody's list, and then they also say that Urinetown and Avenue Q haven't been around long enough to gauge their impact, when Urinetown is older and Avenue Q the same age.
But really, I don't see what Wicked has done or achieved that hasn't been done before. Popular does not equal influential.
Taryn, I agree with you 100%
That doesn't mean it CHANGED b'way. Just because it was the first to do something doesn't make a change.
To make a change, it affects the way things are done BECAUSE of it. It needs to make an IMPACT that makes a difference. I doubt that this will.
I don't like or dislike it. I have no interest in it. I wasn't trying to "dis" it in any sense....just don't know how it CHANGED anything.
I don't think Wicked has changed the face of Broadway. Its been hugely successful, obviously, but through no real innovation. It did however build on the Disney style of producing, the musical as a product, almost like a theme park.
Perhaps stylistically, Mamma Mia? Was it the first musical to use pop songs and intertwine them with a story unrelated to the original artist?
Also, which was the first musical to be based on a film, as opposed to the other way around?
BKLYN: The Musical. It raised the bar for musicals to suck more than ever.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
""The Phantom of the Opera/Cats/Les Miserables (ushered in the synth-rock opera era, also noteworthy for concentrating on the show itself and not about who was in the cast, started the advertising movement where the logo was most important)" "
Would you agree that the show that possibly pioneered that era was Jesus Christ Superstar? "
I'm not sure I would... It was a pretty different situation--JCS never had a worldwide *standard* iconic production like those shows did, no major logo, was successful but was more a phenomenon as a record/series of concerts than the actual show, etc... However Evita, was a more obvious precurser to the Cameron McKintosh technique of megamusicals na dhow to market them for sure.
Re Golden Boy:
"Perhaps the inter-racial love story.... especially taboo between a Black man with Nordic blonde woman.
For some reason a white man with a black, mixed-race or Asian woman wasn't as off putting back then."
That's true--but really did it make enough of an impact to change much at all?
When I was younger i never understood that about interacial relationships--even when tv shows like soap operas started making interacial romances more common, it was seen as much safer to have the man be white and the woman the darker skinned--and this was the 80s into the 90s. But then again I don't really get a lot about racism :P
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/3/06
A Chorus Line- best show. EVER!
um, just wondering, How did BKLYN suck? it's such a good show
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/20/04
Q: How did BKLYN suck?
A: In every possible respect. The music was derivative, the story was inconsequential, the vocals were a screaming competition.
The only thing creative about the show was the costuming.
Wait. BKLYN DID have an impact on history. It's the first and only time where you can say "the costumes looked like garbage" and have it be a compliment!
Swing Joined: 5/4/06
Promise,Promise:Its contemporary pop score had a huge influence on braodway musical's sound for a while,though not very long.Without this show,there wouldn't be Company,Seesaw,Applause and many other shows.
Agreed that Wicked doesn't make the cut. I think if it pre-dated Les Miz/Phantom/Cats it would be one thing, but it's just another in a line of successful spectacle musicals.
I also don't think that either JCS or Evita changed Broadway the way Les Miz/Phantom/Cats did. They were certainly precursors to those large shows but they didn't mark a definite "before" and "after" point the way those later shows did.
I'm wondering if someday we'll look back and see a famous flop as being in this category too. As in "after the failure of X no one was ever willing to make to make a musical of that sort again and thus an era passed away forever."
To answer Hest882:
13????
I think because of 13 there will never be a show with a cast (and band) solely of pre-pubescent children!
Updated On: 11/24/08 at 11:39 AM
A Chorus Line - the first of its kind and at the time the concept was brilliant. Still is.
Les Miserables - I neednt say more.
:)
blaxx wins the thread
the end
I proudly reiterate that...I can't even remember the year, but a couple of years ago, WEST SIDE STORY was voted by playbill readers as the most influential musical of all time
Im shocked nobody has said Angels in America, Ragtime and Caroline or Change. I think all 3 changed the face of broadway.
Ragtime and Caroline or Change were good shows, but didn't change a thing.
Show Boat
The Cradle Will Rock
Oklahoma
Porgy and Bess
West Side Story
Bye Bye Birdie
Hair
Company
Jesus Christ Superstar
Ain't Misbehavin'
Cats
Les Miserables
Rent
Chicago (revival)
Beauty and the Beast
RENT
A Chorus Line
Les Miserables
Company
Any Fosse show
Videos