BJR said: "The two things I find remarkable:
1) This wasn't a profile of her, it was an interview to promote the show, likely arranged by the show's publicist, She took an opportunity she had not earned alone to place herself above everyone she works with.
2) She did not lift anyone else up. Find the point where she name drops other artists in the show or broader community worthy of praise. None. It's all about her.
A disgrace,"
I mean, they doesn't name-drop, but they do say "My favorite thing in the whole process is my cast. So the social aspect and the salary aspect are fulfilling." They're saying they admire the cast they're working with. One could say "my cast" is a bit pejorative, as if they are in charge of the cast or the cast belongs to them. Usually, one would say "my fellow cast members" or something like that.
I do think it's amusing that they put down 1776 as a relic for, essentially, for being written by, as they say, "two white dudes," then go on to praise Hair, which was written by...two white dudes.
More than anything, though, they just sound young to me, which may be why I find little that they say upsetting. They're passionate, and like a lot of passionate people, they seem to see themselves as absolutely right, what they are opposing as absolutely wrong. There's a strong imperative that the world as it stands must be corrected, and they're tilting their lance at those windmills with full force. But, you know, I did that in my 20's (and had radically unfair responses to works of art that didn't align with my own outlook and preferences). I don't think it's that uncommon a condition in one's youth.
Whether they have now doomed themself in the theatrical community, or at least the New York theatrical community, or not, I don't know. I kinda wish people weren't piling on so hard in the comments section of that article or on Porkalob's social media account. Someone here has said they are posting responses under another name under the article. I really can't blame them if they are. I mean, they're being attacked, and justly or unjustly, basically anyone's response when attacked is to attack back.
Sure, it would be better for them to be honest about it, or just withdraw from the conversation, but what do you know, people are imperfect (the very message of 1776, as it happens). To me, that level of hostility they are facing is the downside of the internet. And please don't take that to be my saying people don't have a right to respond or share their point of view. They do. I just wish it didn't have to be so overwhelming or intense.