I appreciate the tacit admission that the only thing a casino can bring to the area that is not already here is gambling. Dining, shows, shopping- all world-class and all here.
I don’t have an issue with gambling and I don’t think a casino will change the character of the area or anything (and if we must have a casino here, I suppose it’s better in this location than that horrible atrocity proposed for Coney Island). I just think it’s a huge boondoggle. These casinos always promise huge tax windfalls, thousands of jobs, business spread to everyone around, and they so often fall far, far short and leave the locals holding the bag. In 5, 10, 15 years, this will have become just another thing in the fabric of the city and eventually no longer sustain itself and fold, leaving everyone to wonder what to do with it.
And my central question remains: how many people will really be enticed into coming to Times Square for a single casino? The dedicated gamers are going elsewhere. Families can’t participate. Perhaps it’ll be a popular option for business conferences, but that’s not enough to sustain it long-term. Cities like Vegas are their casinos- it’s their culture. But in NYC, a casino is competing with one of the most significant cities in the world.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Updated On: 7/12/25 at 07:59 PM