Could Stratford JCS Transfer to Broadway? — Page 2
#27
Posted: 6/23/11 at 12:53am
I want this to transfer so bad. It looks like a great production.
"There’s nothing quite like the power and the passion of Broadway music. "
#28
Posted: 6/23/11 at 12:57am
I would love a new Broadway production of Superstar! Hopefully we'd get a new cast recording this time? Although, personally, I would have preferred a recording of the last revival with Tony Vincent as Judas.
#29
Posted: 6/23/11 at 1:03am
I'd like to see one of our Broadway singers take on the role of Mary Magdalene.
Pilate and Herod look great. What voices.
Pilate and Herod look great. What voices.
Updated On: 6/23/11 at 01:03 AM
#30
Posted: 6/23/11 at 3:17am
Herod smacks of Nathan Lane. If they need to re-cast for Equity reasons in New York, would it kill anyone to call him?
"There is no problem so big that it cannot be run away from."
~ Charles M. Schulz
#31
Posted: 6/23/11 at 4:29am
St James Theatre is free after Hair...
#32
Posted: 6/23/11 at 9:56am
St James Theatre is free after Hair...
No it's not.
The Harry Connick Jr. "On a Clear Day" has booked that theater.
No it's not.
The Harry Connick Jr. "On a Clear Day" has booked that theater.
#33
Posted: 6/23/11 at 11:16am
Really? Is that 100% happening?!
Richard Rogers, Nederlander and maybe Luntt could be free Winter time...
Richard Rogers, Nederlander and maybe Luntt could be free Winter time...
#34
Posted: 6/23/11 at 11:22am
Really? Is that 100% happening?!
Yes. Hence the fact that they have already booked the theatre, and Harry Connick Jr. is attached and confirmed.
Yes. Hence the fact that they have already booked the theatre, and Harry Connick Jr. is attached and confirmed.
"There’s nothing quite like the power and the passion of Broadway music. "
Updated On: 6/23/11 at 11:22 AM
#35
Posted: 6/23/11 at 12:22pm
So let's do the math:
1. No theaters available in New York.
2. Impending arena tour with big creative names, big stars, big producers.
This means that two of my three theories could be correct:
1. Turn Stratford up to "11." He's going to base this arena tour in some way on the Stratford production; I'd say he's basing the sets on it, because the other This is It teams are already attached in the major creative roles.
2. Screw Stratford, my baby wins the race! He's getting the rights to prevent Stratford from moving so his arena tour can proceed without competition.
Only thing that doesn't make sense if either of those is true is Tim Rice's attendance (and meeting to "discuss" things at Des McAnuff's pad, which was less reported). He's very much his own man, and while he is known to sign checks for the money, I highly doubt he'd help ALW play the "keep up appearances" game while they try to get the Stratford transfer rights, unless ALW promised him a huge slice of the arena tour's action.
The other possibility is that the arena tour is not going forward, which is possible, but when comparing the two productions... well, there is no comparison. Ortega's production has what I call the "x factor." Stratford by comparison is just another JCS revival. If it's not going forward, I'd love to know why contracts are being signed and salaries agreed upon.
Should Stratford transfer, I have only two requests: Nathan Lane for Herod (since the guy doing it is a hair away from Nathan-as-Zero right now, and the part is essentially a cameo role), and a new Judas with a stronger voice PLEASE!
1. No theaters available in New York.
2. Impending arena tour with big creative names, big stars, big producers.
This means that two of my three theories could be correct:
1. Turn Stratford up to "11." He's going to base this arena tour in some way on the Stratford production; I'd say he's basing the sets on it, because the other This is It teams are already attached in the major creative roles.
2. Screw Stratford, my baby wins the race! He's getting the rights to prevent Stratford from moving so his arena tour can proceed without competition.
Only thing that doesn't make sense if either of those is true is Tim Rice's attendance (and meeting to "discuss" things at Des McAnuff's pad, which was less reported). He's very much his own man, and while he is known to sign checks for the money, I highly doubt he'd help ALW play the "keep up appearances" game while they try to get the Stratford transfer rights, unless ALW promised him a huge slice of the arena tour's action.
The other possibility is that the arena tour is not going forward, which is possible, but when comparing the two productions... well, there is no comparison. Ortega's production has what I call the "x factor." Stratford by comparison is just another JCS revival. If it's not going forward, I'd love to know why contracts are being signed and salaries agreed upon.
Should Stratford transfer, I have only two requests: Nathan Lane for Herod (since the guy doing it is a hair away from Nathan-as-Zero right now, and the part is essentially a cameo role), and a new Judas with a stronger voice PLEASE!
"There is no problem so big that it cannot be run away from."
~ Charles M. Schulz
Updated On: 6/23/11 at 12:22 PM
#36
Posted: 6/23/11 at 2:14pm
I do like this Herod, his interpretation of the lines and how he speaks directly to Jesus. I've seen other Herods just do their own thing which can be fun but not as dramatic.
While I like Judas, you know who I think would also make a great Judas in NYC? David Burnham.
While I like Judas, you know who I think would also make a great Judas in NYC? David Burnham.
#38
Posted: 6/23/11 at 2:31pm
I like your icon, jcd! It's absurdly cute!
#39
Posted: 6/23/11 at 6:53pm
Must have missed that announcement about on a clear day...!
#40
Posted: 6/23/11 at 9:42pm
If it comes to NYC with the Stratford cast, both leads would be strong candidates for Tony nominations.
No, they're strong candidates for best Tony for a performance by any actor ever in a play OR musical! The season hasn't even shaped up and they're already "strong candidates? Drama queen.
No, they're strong candidates for best Tony for a performance by any actor ever in a play OR musical! The season hasn't even shaped up and they're already "strong candidates? Drama queen.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#41
Posted: 6/24/11 at 7:12am
There's at least one Broadway "name" in the cast - Brent Carver as Pilate.
Faced with these Loreleis, what man can moralize!
#42
Posted: 6/24/11 at 7:27am
Those clips are terrible. Everybody's as stiff as a board. I'm really tired of musical theatre folks trying to sing rock. It's so very careful.
And it's the musical equivalent of Julie Andrews singing a Janet Jackson song.
It doesn't work.
And it's the musical equivalent of Julie Andrews singing a Janet Jackson song.
It doesn't work.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#43
Posted: 6/24/11 at 7:29am
What Ever happened to the Louis St Louis Gospel Version Of JCS they did at the Alliance in 2010. That was suppose to either go to Broadway or Tour and then nothing happened. I heard it was rather good.
There is nothing in the world better than Live Theater.
#44
Posted: 6/24/11 at 9:59am
The Australian revival that AndyBarclay mentions was designed to sell solely on the names of ALW and the Australian stars cast in it. Australia is an increasingly secular society; they certainly weren't going out of interest in the story. In fact, as I recall, they even had to add a program note explaining who Jesus was for the audience's benefit.
The last line of that might be the most offensive thing I have ever read on these boards. Australians know who the **** Jesus is, we are not a bunch of ****ing idiots you dip****.
As for that production of JCS it might have been sold on the names of the cast to start with, but soon took on a life of it's own. It was a thrilling night of theatre.
The last line of that might be the most offensive thing I have ever read on these boards. Australians know who the **** Jesus is, we are not a bunch of ****ing idiots you dip****.
As for that production of JCS it might have been sold on the names of the cast to start with, but soon took on a life of it's own. It was a thrilling night of theatre.
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
#45
Posted: 6/24/11 at 11:23am
On Wed june 22 Rice saw the show , after was talking to Des in the loading dock of the Avon theatre.
The show was great , Des out did himself this time.
The buzz at intermission and after the show was great . I haven't heard this kind of excitment since the second preview of
Crazy For You on Broadway.
The show was great , Des out did himself this time.
The buzz at intermission and after the show was great . I haven't heard this kind of excitment since the second preview of
Crazy For You on Broadway.
#46
Posted: 6/24/11 at 12:07pm
The last line of that might be the most offensive thing I have ever read on these boards. Australians know who the **** Jesus is, we are not a bunch of ****ing idiots you dip****.
Then explain the need for this program note about who Jesus was.
It was a guy from Australia who is a super-fan of this show that actually explained the reasoning behind it to me.
Said note
Then explain the need for this program note about who Jesus was.
It was a guy from Australia who is a super-fan of this show that actually explained the reasoning behind it to me.
Said note
"There is no problem so big that it cannot be run away from."
~ Charles M. Schulz
Updated On: 6/24/11 at 12:07 PM
#47
Posted: 6/24/11 at 6:07pm
The Aussie may have meant becoming more "diverse" rather than "secular" since there is now a Moslem presence and more peoples of other religions, Hindus, etc. in Australia. For just that reason it's a very good idea to have the little write-up on Jesus in the program. I'd like to have it if I went to a theatrical production about another religion.
Here's the other BWW clip with Judas singing.
Here's the other BWW clip with Judas singing.
#48
Posted: 6/24/11 at 7:06pm
The clips don't seem too different from the most recent revival, with nods to the original London production too. It all looks a bit clean and polite - and yet I loved Des McAnuff's staging of Tommy. Whatever people are raving about in Stratford can't be coming across in the clips - including the power in the Judas performance. So to anyone who's seen it and rates it 'what is it that it has got'? My initial excitement evaporated on seeing the clips, but I'd like to change my view!
#49
Posted: 6/24/11 at 9:18pm
I have to say, absolutely none of the energy, passion or edge translated through the videos. The clips seem very stagnant as opposed to the life that was onstage.
However, I'll agree that rock voices are not at the forefront of this production. This is definitely a musical theatre treatment of the piece -- with some seriously kick ass orchestrations. I'd say the focus is on telling the story and creating some seriously fleshed-out characters and relationships, which is does in barrel-fulls. The voices are all fantastic and quite capable, but not necessarily "rock voices."
However, I'll agree that rock voices are not at the forefront of this production. This is definitely a musical theatre treatment of the piece -- with some seriously kick ass orchestrations. I'd say the focus is on telling the story and creating some seriously fleshed-out characters and relationships, which is does in barrel-fulls. The voices are all fantastic and quite capable, but not necessarily "rock voices."
#50
Posted: 6/24/11 at 9:32pm
Looks a lot more interesting and organized than the recent Broadway staging. Is this cast a little older?
Video clips can't do live theatre justice. You can't get the tingles of stage presence.
Video clips can't do live theatre justice. You can't get the tingles of stage presence.
Updated On: 6/24/11 at 09:32 PM
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $95