Roscoe said: "Saw this the other night. A tasty production, tight and interesting, of a not particularly interesting or novel play. I was sure of where the play was going, just not quite sure of the route it was going to take.
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler ContentIt was painfully evident in short order that Henry was going to be slain, and that Max would stay in the house. Was it going to be some kind of fertility ritual, or what -- well, they went for a frankly not interesting Man Bad Woman Good vibe. All the songs and chanting and gimmicks (look! there's new stuff in the fridge!), as skillfully done as they are, can't hide the familiarity of way too much of the proceedings.
One odd element of the evening was the solid laughter that was heard every time Laurie Metcalf did anything, anything at all. Was it a nervous response to the creep factor happening on stage? Or are people unwilling to take her in anything but comic mode? Was this happening at other performances?"
I think the show itself is just a very funny show, on top of being a literary thirller - I found it to be much funnier than the likes of Shucked or PPGW, AND the humorous lines act to actually progress the plot and characters, unlike those two shows.
As for your spoiler tag, it's amazing how split some people are on that. I feel like some people think it's evident/obvious, a lot of people feel like it's mysterious and a fun puzzle, and others just completely turn off and say it's incomprehensible without really trying (although to be fair, there's been less of that as previews have progressed, I saw it for a 3rd time last night and there is an entirely new transition between two scenes to very clearly spell out a key point, as-if the writer is saying, "Here, you all said this wasn't obvious, let's shove it in your face!", as well as 4 major line changes to really spell out some of the implied meaning that were part of the puzzle).. the show also posted some of their own spoilers that were inside the playbill as an insert/link to the website, which was new, so they're trying really hard to make the show accessible for a variety of people it seems. They also had a talkback with one of their co-producers who is some YouTuber after the show, and it was the most people I've ever seen stick around for a talkback. Maybe half the orchestra stayed and 1/4-1/3 of the balcony/mezz? Had to have been at least 200-300 people... the audience discussion got through 4 questions in 45 minutes with a ton of pretty exciting theories. It was pretty impressive to hear such a variety of theories and meanings that people took from the show.
To me it's like Broadway theater has transformed post-covid to be almost entirely spoonfed and incredibly simple. Rarely do you get a Broadway show to make you think for this many hours, and the talkback I saw last night as a testament to how the show is truly thought provoking and beautiful in its construction. The commentary on cyclical abuse runs so deep and w/ every scene packed with connecting imagery and staging, I can easily see why Mantello loved this as a project... even something like Kimberly Akimbo, you sort of just walk out and say, "man, absuive families suck!" and "that was a fun musical!" that's basically it... conversations about the meaning and subject rarely last more than 30 mintues, let alone the hours and hours and hours of discussion I've had with my friends and at/after that talkback last night.
I am really rooting for positive reviews on this. I think this is a show that Broadway needs, needs more of, and if it does well it'll open the door for a lot more thoughtful productions to come out in the future.
Updated On: 6/1/23 at 02:34 PM