Happy New Year everyone! (I am 16 hours ahead of the NYC timezone).
Regarding the chart, obviously it is just my opinion so happy to be challenged. Though it's always more interesting to provide some actual detail if you do want to challenge it. And that opinion has been formed primarily based on recordings (including professionally shot videos at the Lincoln Archive, cast recordings, audience recordings, the BBC broadcast etc.) or in the case of Ethel Merman, I've also factored in some second hand opinions given that visually, her performance is not well documented.
I haven't fully made up my mind about Imelda's performance yet. Vocally, to me it's nothing particularly special at all and out of all the major stage roses, the only one it tops for me is Tyne's (who based on available recordings really was not THAT much better in the theatre than on the cast recording. e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJM6nNMXJlc. She is a great example of an actor who sings).
However, there is no doubt in my mind that Imelda is a great actress. She is also a classically trained, acclaimed actress. And looking at the scenes leading up into "Rose's Turn", for example, I am impressed at how convincingly fractured she makes Rose seem. Her facial expressions, overwhelmed emotion, posture, hand shaking etc. - all seems very skilful to me.

So the question for me is whether the vision of how she played her character is 'wrong'. I always have felt that Rose has some kind of mental illness (she lies, uses people, is impulsive, and can be aggressive). So I can definitely understand some of the choices that were made. But, like other unpleasant characters in our cannon (e.g., Fosca), it can sometimes be a bit hard to care about an unpleasant, difficult, awful person.
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
Updated On: 12/31/15 at 08:41 PM