ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "Freelancers and "at large" critics with transient careers are going to drive producers/investors crazy, since the producers are still in the mindset that they can trust reviews to aide their decision in moving a show to Broadway.
If this had a positive or negative review from a chief critic, it would dictate Ken Davenport's next steps. Now he's in this weird limbo zone because you have no idea what kind of review you'll get when it actually moves to Broadway –– and yes, reviews still matter to an extent."
Elizabeth Vincentelli has been reviewing for the Times for years. Co-chief critic means nothing to the reviews themselves. The lone chief critic there now often takes pleasure in writing incoherent, catty drivel, so unless your point is they need another to balance that out, not sure what you’re getting at.
And I assure you that used car salesman Ken Davenport of all people is not phased by critical reception to work he produces. Let’s not forget he is the mind behinds Gettin’ The Band Back Together. People don’t move a show to Broadway on whether or not they can bank on a good review, they move it to Broadway to make money. Reviews help, but no producer is banking on a rave from the Times being the sole reason they move a show.