Most of the responses to Glittergrrl's post have been valid in terms of their content, but the tone has been way harsh.
Harsh? Absolutely. Valid? Only kinda sorta. Glitter wrote about how she felt about what she saw. If she left because of how she felt about what she saw, then it's perfectly understandable. It doesn't have to be about how we felt. It doesn't have to be about what happens in the second act because she didn't see it. Pointing out what she missed and how her opinion may have changed is fine and great. But criticizing and personally insulting her because she didn't form a desired opinion or retain the same information doesn't actually make her look stupid or foolish. I'm really surprised by some of the responses and really scratching my head about these reactions.
As for not paying attention, I definitely tune out when I'm not enjoying a show. Hell, I absolutely LOVED Hamilton, but I admit I missed a lot struggling to keep up with the book and lyrics throughout the pace of the show (which is only one of the many reasons I really want to see it again).
I threw away my shot!
And still retains a sense of humor. Thank you!
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 8/6/15 at 03:30 PM