Harry Potter's Box Office Illusions

I think it is incredibly hard to keep a 2 part play selling at high premiums for this long of a run. A 2 part theatre experience comes with the air of "an event." Events have high demand and buzz at their outset, but they also have expiration dates.

With 2 plays, you are asking much more of a commitment from tourist audiences. It becomes an entire day, or 2 nights, of your vacation. Die-hards will surely not blink an eye at this. And they havent. But how many casual Potter fans will dedicate that much of their NYC vacation to one experience? Not only does it eat up double the time, but it is double the cost. And requires additional planning to make sure you can fit both parts into your itinerary.

None of this was as much of an issue when it first debuted and was THE ticket to get. Everyone wants to take part in those must-do experiences. But there are other must-do Broadway experiences that have debuted since. And with the family-friendly market split between Potter, 3 Disney shows, Beetlejuice, and Mean Girls, this 2 part epic was bound to dwindle in numbers. It is now less of a priority.

It also doesn't help that the Lyric is an astoundingly large theatre. I don't know what was envisioned to go in there when they first combined the two old houses into one, but short of Lion King or Wicked moving there, I just don't know what can truly thrive in that space for an open ended run.

MayAudraBlessYou2 said: It also doesn't help that the Lyric is an astoundingly large theatre. I don't know what was envisioned to go in there when they first combined the two old houses into one, but short of Lion King or Wicked moving there, I just don't know what can truly thrive in that space for an open ended run."

Ragtime. Ragtime was always planned to be the first show. And the theater's capacity has been reduced to 1600 seats (approximately). I assume they won't restore the original size when Cursed Child eventually closes.

The combination of being a two-part play and the obscene high prices, plus the fact that tourists don't buy theater tickets too far in advance, have lead to a drop in advance sales. Looking ahead, you can easily see very few seats have been sold. It's astonishing that they simply don't lower prices. This is endemic of the modern Broadway show: keep the prices where they are, even if no one's buying. As a result, they have to lower the price substantially at the last minute to sell them. Maybe only keep a small portion of the theater at premium prices, and reduce prices everywhere else. Maybe the average ticket price would improve.

Fosse76 said: "MayAudraBlessYou2 said:It also doesn't help that the Lyric is an astoundingly large theatre. I don't know what was envisioned to go in there when they first combined the two old houses into one, but short of Lion King or Wicked moving there, I just don't know what can truly thrive in that space for an open ended run."

Ragtime. Ragtime was always planned to be the first show. And the theater's capacity has been reduced to 1600 seats (approximately). I assume they won't restore the original size when Cursed Child eventually closes.

The combination of being a two-part play and the obscene high prices, plus the fact that tourists don't buy theater tickets too far in advance, have lead to a drop in advance sales. Looking ahead, you can easily see very few seats have been sold. It's astonishing that they simply don't lower prices. This is endemic of the modern Broadway show: keep the prices where they are, even if no one's buying. As a result, they have to lower the price substantially at the last minute to sell them. Maybe only keep a small portion of the theater at premium prices, and reduce prices everywhere else. Maybe the average ticket price would improve."

I think that ATG will keep it smaller, which makes it more marketable to shows. No producer wants to fill up a cavernous barn every night.


Also, I might be misreading something in the article, but aren't the producers lowering the prices? Maybe, you mean discounting v. reducing prices altogether?

How did they reduce the Lyric's capacity? I know they renovated the entire theatre for Cursed Child but did they block off sections of the orchestra/mezz/balcony?

FANtomFollies said: "How did they reduce the Lyric's capacity? I know they renovated the entire theatre for Cursed Child but did they block off sections of the orchestra/mezz/balcony?"

Actually, the dress circle was extended forward, so there are more seats there, but the orchestra was significantly narrowed, removing approximately 12-14 seats from each row.

Princeton2 said: "The play itself has received mixed word of mouth, especially amongst hardcore potter fans who would be more likely to invest in seeing both parts. Plus with other productions opening up people dont necessarily have to travel to nyc to see it, they can wait for it to be a bit closer to home"

You could look at it that way, but I'm a megafan and have seen the show...a lot. I think fans who've seen it enjoy it overall, but I will agree there is a part of the fanbase rejecting it.

sparksatmidnight said: "It looks worse with Harry Potter because if you don't sell a seat, then you almost automatically also have an unsold seat for the other part, but every show does this. I'm sure the producers will just rise prices again when times are better. Sonia Friedman is not a newcomer"

I feel like once people get accustomed to the lower prices, it will be difficult to jack them up again. It's not like the holiday spike.

VotePeron said: "Princeton2 said: "The play itself has received mixed word of mouth, especially amongst hardcore potter fans who would be more likely to invest in seeing both parts. Plus with other productions opening up people dont necessarily have to travel to nyc to see it, they can wait for it to be a bit closer to home"

You could look at it that way, but I'm a megafan and have seen the show...a lot. I think fans who've seen it enjoy it overall, but I will agree there is a part of the fanbase rejecting it."

Yeah I wonder about that? Like I grew up an avid Harry Potter fan– went to the midnight releases for new books and then read them within hours, it was my first foray into online fandom, all that. The original series is still very dear to me. But I have no interest in the play. I read the synopsis and it sounds like a chimera of every bad fanfiction I read in high school. Though, for what it's worth, I haven't watched Fantastic Beasts either. The HP story felt complete to me with the seventh book (unless they make a period drama about the Hogwarts founders, that's my dream ; )

A few thoughts.

The show is brilliant. That's not why it isn't grossing as much as it did when it opened. It's epic theater -- come on, it's John Tiffany and Stephen Hoggett. It's such good storytelling and it's definitely a legit Harry Potter experience. Yes, I'm a fan.

OK. So the challenges. No two-part play has ever run more than a few months on Broadway. Even the brilliant Nicholas Nickleby only ran for 12 weeks and tanked on a return visit a year later.

Harry Potter had a huge opening and has now leveled out over a year into the run, a traditional pattern for many long-running musicals, never mind two-part plays!

The time and cost is a challenge, but it's an amazing experience and people are paying stupid numbers to see everything now.

Crazy idea about making it a one part show at this point, but I guess you would get twice as many unique buyers in a week and it deals with the time challenge for people coming to New York for a limited time. Fans (yes, me as well) would do more than once.

I have no idea if it make any logistical or economic sense while the show is still making money as a two parter.

I so think Harry Potter is going to be around a while on Broadway.

I just got an email advertising a new discounted batch of tickets. I was able to get fifth row center on Halloween for $130/night. That's a really cheap deal and there were TONS of seats available for those dates and nearly all dates in November.