"I disagree. If the cast recording is not good, then there is no way the show is gonna be good."
"There is no way a show can be good if it has a mediocre cast recording. Pure and simple."
You are wrong on so many levels.
I liked Little Mermaid's cast recording, but didn't care for the show. I like Chicago's cast recording, but didn't care for the show either. I didn't care for Legally Blonde's cast recording much, but thought it was a good show.
A cast recording isn't the only thing that makes a show. You forgot book, orchestrations, sets, costumes, etc.!
Broadway Star Joined: 12/25/04
I can't argue with such an obvious statement BNN
Broadway Star Joined: 12/12/05
Because there is nothing to argue about!
The cast recording of a show tells you absolutely nothing about it, that's why you are meant to SEE theatre and not listen to it or read it.
The BILLY ELLIOT cast recording is just ok at best. The show is one of the most incredible theatrical experiences I've had in my life ! Don't be too narrow-minded.
"Nope just stating the truth. The cast recording is the number one consideration when I look for a show for our community theater."
Then I am really glad I am not a part of your community theatre because then I'd miss out on too many good shows.
Broadway Star Joined: 12/25/04
book, orchestrations, sets, costumes, etc. is a small part of a musical. The songs and the people singing them and the way they sing them is way more important.
"Nope just stating the truth. The cast recording is the number one consideration when I look for a show for our community theater"
i know this gonna shock, BUT THIS IS BROADWAY NOT COMMUNITY THEATER
Broadway Star Joined: 12/25/04
You say that like there is a huge difference between the two. The major difference is the advanced technology on Broadway.
<< Xanadu, on the other hand, was entertaining, well-performed by a dazzling cast, fast-paced and the most fun of any show this season. >>
Did you see all of the nominated shows, Ed?
I LOVE "Xanadu" and the entire cast to death, but I noticed that you didnt mention all of the other shows, so what are you basing your opinion on?
I cant comment on "A Catered Affair" because I havent seen it, but loved the other three shows that were nominated for Best Musical.
people... don't waste your time with Jackson.
only judging shows on cast recordings. god.
do you live on the West Coast or something? are you really poor and just can't afford it?
Or are you just SO damn lazy, that you can't get off your ass and actually go see the shows??
When I listened to the Drowsy Chaperone cast recording, I thought it was terrible, save for about 2 songs. Then I saw it. It's now one of my favorites.
jackson also thinks sweeney todd is a god awful show and loves wedding singer, that should tell us everything we need to know
Broadway Star Joined: 3/27/04
The better question is, how did "Cry Baby" get nominated over the BEST new musical of the season, "A Catered Affair"?
Really? Really?! First of all, the show does not come from the cast recording, the cast recording merely consists of musical numbers (and sometimes dialogue) from a show. Second of all, reviewers of the recording said it was a poor representation of the actual show, which I believe is somewhat correct. However, Xanadu is a fun night at the theater; it's irreverent, hysterical and not afraid to make fun of itself. You really can't judge a live theatrical experience from a recording. For shame.
....YES IT CAN.
Broadway Star Joined: 12/25/04
Nope I live in South Dakota LOL
I have a cousin who lives in South Dakota.
he's a dumbass too.
Broadway Star Joined: 12/25/04
Nope just stating the truth.
No you're not. You're stating a very uninformed, ignorant and closed-minded opinion.
The cast recording is the number one consideration when I look for a show for our community theater.
And? It certainly doesn't prove you know what you're talking about, which probably isn't true anyway.
XANADU got nominated because it is (in my opinion) the third best new musical this year (#1 is A CATERED AFFAIR, 2 is IN THE HEIGHTS, and 3 is XANADU).
It also got nominated because it exceeded expectations, to say the least. And it's extremely, undeniably fun. Can we discuss how the heck CRY-BABY got nominated instead? It's a far, far, far worse show and it got the same amount of nominations. Now that's an argument. There is, in my mind, no argument about XANADU being nominated. It was fun and brisk entertainment and deserved a mention.
Whilst I disagree entirely that a show is only as good as it's recording, I would also like to point out that the recording of 'Xanadu' does not do the show justice at all in my opinion. I just don't think it is well produced.
The show is great - not sure where I stand on it's award nomination yet though.
"book, orchestrations, sets, costumes, etc. is a small part of a musical. The songs and the people singing them and the way they sing them is way more important."
Hahahahaha! Tell that to all of the scenic designers, costume designers, orchestrators and book writers who work in the theatre! You are extremely ignorant and uninformed! If the design was such a small part of the show, the actors could do it themselves! No, that's why there are professionals hired to perform those extremely challenging and meaningful jobs. Anyone educated (and most who aren't) in theatre can tell you that every area has to work together to be a successful show. The design needs to fit the needs of the story, the book and score need to fit the story, and the actors need to fit and be able to effectively portray the design, story, score, and book.
I guess the scenic design is just a small part of the revival of Sunday in the Park with George! Hmm, and to think they actually spent a lot of time and hard work for such a small and unimportant aspect of a show. Oh well, it's so hard to find good help these days.
Why is Jackson such an idiot?
Nominated because:
1) A really weak year for musicals
2) Rich young producers who should be spending their money to feed the impoverished instead
Updated On: 6/8/08 at 11:42 PM
Videos