Extrapolate beyond the stated. What I think hunter is saying is that theatre should not need mark sanchez to bring it credibility. It should not need CZJ or ScarJo to put buts in the seats. And it certainly should not need a 7 min green day performance to make it more accessible and more appealing to the masses. It should stand alone as its own entity. And if the broadcasting company chosen to present the biggest night of theatre cannot see this, then maybe its time we find one that will. Screw the trickery/stunts to get ratings. Keep it about the art!
I get it! And i agree.
THAT BEING SAID...this is the world we live in. It is sad to think it, but to keep dollars rolling in, butts in the seats, and ratings up, theatre does need it.
Give theatre back to the theatre actors...(i paraphrase) is a tough statement to stomach. But i understand it. If you eliminate broadways biggest stars from presenting, in favor of Hollywoods brightest (In attendance), youre missing the point of the evening. Because the idea becomes... "Harry Potter will get the tween girls watching" and not... "Bryan Stokes and Audra presenting the revival performance of Ragtime would drive theatre folks wild!" The show HAS been given over to trying to get new people to watch... and repeat watchers are feeling left out.
Its the same for casting shows... its all about stunts and less about proper casting. Im not saying that Scarjo doesnt give a great performance... but is there a theatre girl who could have given a better performance...probably. I'm GUESSING that Hunter and those theatre folks who have joined the group are starting to get sick of all the stunts. When the art form starts to suffer, then are the stunts worth it?
I can see Hunters frustration. And i can also see how people can misconstrue what he is getting at. I also see that commercial theatre is headed down a busted road with the juke box musical at the helm.
Updated On: 6/17/10 at 01:34 PM