#1
Posted: 5/27/13 at 12:48pm
I'm curious. What was it, exactly, that had these boards (and most SMASH recappers) fully in the Ivy camp?
Was it Karen's ease into which she became a star? (perfect, perfect Karen). That doesn't make much sense as these boards love Laura Osnes who seems to have had a similar, easy trajectory. Or was it merely the weak performances by Kat McPhee? If she had been the same character played by a better equipped actress would that have made a difference. Or maybe it wasn't her acting, maybe it was that Kat was an "outsider", not someone like Megan Hilty who is "one of us", someone from the theatuh.
Was it just Megan is such a talented Broadway baby that she so easily showed up Karen whenever they performed (I will continue to argue, however, the camera itself did not love Megan as it loved Kat).
Cause let's face it. Ivy Lynn was HORRIBLE. While Karen, a bit naive, a bit sugary, was basically, truly a good person. Of course it didn't help the show didn't know whose side it was on either. They tried to redeem Ivy this season but I could not forget her awfulness from Season One.
As truly bad as she was last season, the icing on the cake was her line about Hit List never making it to Broadway if Kyle Bishop hadn't died. Imagine if the lead of whatever competing musical that was up against Rent the year it won had said that??? How all but the most snarky ("but its true") people would HATE her. And yes, I know SMASH is far from the real world. But Ivy having said something so terrible (and it was a truly terrible thing to say) she would be ostracized by the community for years. For YEARS! Now, as for her winning the Tony, the ballots may have gone out before she said that, so I will not object to her winning. But the reception she received? That quote was on YouTube!! Everyone knows what she said. If this were the real Tony awards (and again, I know SMASH and "reality" rarely ever went together) the community would have been far more offended by what she said than what Derek did! Far more. For better or worse. And we should have been deeply offended too. But the "I'm so glad Ivy won!" posts have made me sorta angry. (I personally would have preferred Audra McDonald winning for "House of Flowers" as she seems to be a genuinely good person with the requisite talent).
Oddly, obviously, no one here had a problem with hating another sociopathic character even though he was played by "one of our own" as well. I don't get it.
I have a high moral compass when it comes to TV characters. I get disgusted when I notice people(usually straight men) who idolize Tony Soprano or Walter White. And though Ivy Lynn's crimes are of a far less lethal variety, shame on the queens who think talent trumps civility. As much as I really wanted to strangle Kat McPhee at times, that's why I was always on Team Karen.
Was it Karen's ease into which she became a star? (perfect, perfect Karen). That doesn't make much sense as these boards love Laura Osnes who seems to have had a similar, easy trajectory. Or was it merely the weak performances by Kat McPhee? If she had been the same character played by a better equipped actress would that have made a difference. Or maybe it wasn't her acting, maybe it was that Kat was an "outsider", not someone like Megan Hilty who is "one of us", someone from the theatuh.
Was it just Megan is such a talented Broadway baby that she so easily showed up Karen whenever they performed (I will continue to argue, however, the camera itself did not love Megan as it loved Kat).
Cause let's face it. Ivy Lynn was HORRIBLE. While Karen, a bit naive, a bit sugary, was basically, truly a good person. Of course it didn't help the show didn't know whose side it was on either. They tried to redeem Ivy this season but I could not forget her awfulness from Season One.
As truly bad as she was last season, the icing on the cake was her line about Hit List never making it to Broadway if Kyle Bishop hadn't died. Imagine if the lead of whatever competing musical that was up against Rent the year it won had said that??? How all but the most snarky ("but its true") people would HATE her. And yes, I know SMASH is far from the real world. But Ivy having said something so terrible (and it was a truly terrible thing to say) she would be ostracized by the community for years. For YEARS! Now, as for her winning the Tony, the ballots may have gone out before she said that, so I will not object to her winning. But the reception she received? That quote was on YouTube!! Everyone knows what she said. If this were the real Tony awards (and again, I know SMASH and "reality" rarely ever went together) the community would have been far more offended by what she said than what Derek did! Far more. For better or worse. And we should have been deeply offended too. But the "I'm so glad Ivy won!" posts have made me sorta angry. (I personally would have preferred Audra McDonald winning for "House of Flowers" as she seems to be a genuinely good person with the requisite talent).
Oddly, obviously, no one here had a problem with hating another sociopathic character even though he was played by "one of our own" as well. I don't get it.
I have a high moral compass when it comes to TV characters. I get disgusted when I notice people(usually straight men) who idolize Tony Soprano or Walter White. And though Ivy Lynn's crimes are of a far less lethal variety, shame on the queens who think talent trumps civility. As much as I really wanted to strangle Kat McPhee at times, that's why I was always on Team Karen.
Updated On: 5/27/13 at 12:48 PM