Too often lately, I find myself telling people I know and those on the boards, that they shouldn't rely on professional critics to dictate which shows they see or don't see. People need to decide for themselves by using all of the information out there, but as a guideline only. I always try to get different sources of information, plus casting, etc.; but in the end, it is my own gut feeling and cost that determines what I see. (Of course, always try for the discount , in case of a bad choice.)
Even doing those things, I have been majorly disappointed at a few shows which critics loved...two which come to mind are PHANTOM OF THE OPERA (Bdwy) and HAIRSPRAY (Bdwy). I even gave HAIRSPRAY a second turn and I still didn't like it, and can't understand what all of the praise/fuss is about it. PHANTOM was too much torture the first time, I couldn't think about giving it another chance. Similar experiences???
the Producers and Spamalot...I still retain the latter shouldn't even be called theater. Yes it is enjoyable...it's an enjoayble sketch comedy performance, and has no value beyond that.
...My Name In Lights: If you would have done your homework, you would have read that Phantom didn't entirely recieve the "starlet" reviews that you probably think it did. Phantom of the Opera does, and always has, relied on word-of-mouth. The reviews weren't bad at all, but crystal clear reviews were not given by the critics.
...As for the Producers, oh my goodness, can we say a TAD overrated. The show was okay, but did it deserve everything it received, I'm not so sure I think so. I am not personally the kind of person who likes to rely on critics to make decisions for me. I think it's fun to read one persons opinion occasionally, even though they are usually consist of a lot of drivel. I always say it is better to make up your own mind. A review is just the view of the one person who happened to see a show on one particular night, lol. If you're not sure whether or not you want to see a show because a critic said something nasty, test the waters and see for yourself!
Bye!
Phantom05
------- "We Drink Your Blood And Then We Eat Your Soul, Nothings Gonna Stop Us Let The Bad Times Roll"
-------"Past The Point Of No Return, No Backward Glances, Abandon Thought And Let The Dream Begin"
Actually, I was quite young when PHANTOM opened and didn't see it until it had been running quite awhile. But, when I refer to shows that critics hail, it doesn't have to be a unanimous vote from them, just something they like than happens to disappoint me as an audience member. Hence, I don't ever rely on their opinions alone. It bothers me that so many people are influenced by their opinions and then adopt them as their own...which often becomes the "word of mouth" to which you refer. Advance sales also account for the perpetuation of a show's run. People who are easily influenced by critics and word of mouth jump on the bandwagon to buy tickets just so they can say they saw "the" show.
As far as the term "starlet" is concerned, I've never heard of it; although I have heard of "sterling" reviews.
The Producers. I felt that it was only Nathan Lane that elevated the show - sure there were funny moments, but it wasn't anywhere near as good as the critics and awards had led me to believe it would be.
Miss Saigon - the first time I saw it I was very tired and had extremely bad seats (right at the back of the Gods in Drury Lane). I did appreciate its merits much more when I saw it from a slightly different angle
Norbert Leo Butz quotes about John Lithgow: "He's really clumsy. One of the joys in life is to watch a great big huge man totally wipe out backstage. It takes John about three minutes to hit the floor. It's like watching a Great Sequoia falling gracelessly."
Jekyll & Hyde and The Boy from Oz do not qualify as shows that were "hailed by critics as great." Both opened to largely terrible reviews (though Boy from Oz did receive praise for Hugh Jackman's performance).
I also recall Phantom of the Opera receiving a somewhat chilly reception. At least Frank Rich's review had major reservations, even if he admired the production for its spectacle.
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.