Posted: 4/15/16 at 4:05pm
Its either poor producing or a sign or trouble to come for future productions. For a show to have averaged $900,000.00 a week last year and $800k this year to fold - something's wrong. If their expenses weren't so high they could have gotten at least another year out of the show if not more. Its a huge favorite with young audiences and sells out when the kids are in town. I know Matilda had additional carrying costs for the child actors and the turn over costs when they aged out but I seem to also remember the investment deal wasn't great either with the London producers taking a larger than usual chunk through percentages and royalties. If the numbers are right on the grosses pages here Matilda to-date grossed an average of one million a week since opening. Kinky Boots averaged closer to 1.2 million per week but I bet their expenses were more than $100k a week less than Matilda's. But then again they can predict their future sales based on history and announcing an end date can pump that up before Charlie comes to town and becomes the next big kids show. Also doesn't help that its sitting on prime real estate and the Shuberts are probably looking for a premium seat seller. Whats does the future hold "$1M dollar stop clauses?