greenify, thanks for the photo! They have section 400 seats at the open end of the horseshoe that are discounted, which seems to be in line with the idea that the band would be at that end.
The first row of seats in the 200s is labeled as "floor seating," unsurprisingly premium (although only "mid-premium," which is not the most expensive premium seats).
"What was the name of that cheese that I like?"
"you can't run away forever...but there's nothing wrong with getting a good head start"
"well I hope and I pray, that maybe someday, you'll walk in the room with my heart"
I grabbed 1 seat for a matinee in April. FLOOR SEATING Row FL, Seat 227 (aisle). I ended up getting one of those floor seats with this message after purchase: “Seating will be wooden seats at tables positioned on stage.”
First time seeing the show. I bought sand seats for OOTI the first time I saw that show so we’ll see!
"You can't overrate Bernadette Peters. She is such a genius. There's a moment in "Too Many Mornings" and Bernadette doing 'I wore green the last time' - It's a voice that is just already given up - it is so sorrowful. Tragic. You can see from that moment the show is going to be headed into such dark territory and it hinges on this tiny throwaway moment of the voice." - Ben Brantley (2022)
"Bernadette's whole, stunning performance [as Rose in Gypsy] galvanized the actors capable of letting loose with her. Bernadette's Rose did take its rightful place, but too late, and unseen by too many who should have seen it" Arthur Laurents (2009)
"Sondheim's own favorite star performances? [Bernadette] Peters in ''Sunday in the Park,'' Lansbury in ''Sweeney Todd'' and ''obviously, Ethel was thrilling in 'Gypsy.'' Nytimes, 2000
I had trouble loading the site as well, including getting it loaded but my search only turning up only around 5 seats total for the performance I wanted. I tried again a couple hours later and it was all sorted out. Grabbed a couple of the last row tickets for March 28th and hoping they choose to amplify the voices this time around. It was fine for me at St. Ann’s (I was in the front row and enjoyed the purity of the voices in the space), but Circle in the Square is a bit larger and taller so I’d worry about all that sound getting sucked up into the void.
Yes, I’ve been in Circle in the Square and have been to St. Ann’s several times. No need for condescension. At least in relation to how they mounted the show at St. Ann’s, Circle in the Square seems larger (though not terribly much) to me and there will certainly be more bodies in the space. So yes, I worry about the sound traveling properly to every ear in the space.
St. Anne’s is large, but they didn’t use the entirety of it. They built the “barn” inside, and that barn had its own dimensions and acoustics that were very different from that of St. Anne’s own walls, and very different from Circle in the Square. The playing space at CITS May be similar to what they had at St. Anne’s, but the audience will be much larger. The people sitting in the back at CITS will be significantly further away than anyone who saw the show at St. Anne’s. And the acoustics are completely different.
They would be making a huge mistake to do this without mics at CITS.
There's no way they won't use mics for this. Curious what they will do with the walls on the opposite sides of the theatre. (One was a mural of a prairie, and one was covered with guns.) Which one will be kept for the new production?
On another note, I wish that Damon Daunno were in Hadestown instead of this. He is perfect in the role of Orpheus, but from what I've seen, Reeve Carney isn't the best.
The dream ballet should be changed too. SAWOklahoma was my first production, and I had no idea what was going on during the dream ballet.
Lastly, I hope they change the intermission food recipes. The chili was too spicy for me.
The dream ballet should be changed too. SAWOklahomawas my first production, and I had no idea what was going on during the dream ballet.
Lastly, I hope they change the intermission food recipes. The chili was too spicy for me."
I had a long discussion last night with a friend about this production’s dream ballet, and while I thought it beautiful and a thrilling dance piece, I agree that it makes very little sense if you don’t know the show pretty well already. My friend didn’t know Oklahoma! well at all, and he was just deeply confused through the entire ballet. The ballet in this production is much less directly connected to the narrative than in a traditional production, and it’s moved to the second act, which divorces it from Laurie drifting off into unconsciousness. If you know the show well, it’s a fascinating, beautiful, and somewhat uncomfortable departure, but if you don’t know how it normally plays, I think it might feel like an insertion from a completely different show.
Where I will disagree with you is the chili; I found it weirdly bland. Maybe they modified the recipe over the course of the production?
Did they move the Dream Ballet to the top of Act 2? Or did they move the intermission to before the Dream Ballet?
Sort of like is the glass half empty or half full? Or if a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound? Or, are you wet when you’re underwater?