Oratorio for Living Things returns at Signature- Page 2

[WiCkEDrOcKS]

Posted: 10/8/25 at 9:05am

It is indeed about 90 minutes (probably closer to 95, if we're splitting hairs).

I thought it was breathtaking, but I'd recommend avoiding the last couple of rows of the 200s and 400s. The orchestra is situated directly behind the last rows of those sections and drowned out some of the vocals.  (The musicians do sound fantastic, though.)

 

Updated On: 10/8/25 at 09:05 AM

[Sauja]

Posted: 10/8/25 at 12:23pm

WiCkEDrOcKS said: "It is indeed about 90 minutes (probably closer to 95, if we're splitting hairs).

I thought it was breathtaking, but I'd recommend avoiding the last couple ofrows of the 100s and 300s. The orchestra is situated directly behind the last rows of those sections and (while they do indeed sound fantastic) drowned out some of the vocals.

"

Fully agreed. Think it started at 7:05-ish and wrapped just after 9:40. 

 

But, Wicked, I thiiiink it's the 200 and 400 sections that have the orchestra behind them. I was in D in the 400s, and the band was behind row E, and it looked like the same was true across the way, which looking at the map would have been the 200s. That said, in Row D of the 400s, the band's sound levels were only an issue for me at one specific moment. Otherwise, the sound was pretty great!

 

It's a stunning piece. I saw it at Ars Nova and followed along in the lyrics. This time, I let go and let it wash over me. The latter was my preferred experience. It's just so, so beautiful, musically.

[WiCkEDrOcKS]

Posted: 10/8/25 at 1:12pm

Sauja said: "WiCkEDrOcKS said: "It is indeed about 90 minutes (probably closer to 95, if we're splitting hairs).

I thought it was breathtaking, but I'd recommend avoiding the last couple ofrows of the 100s and 300s. The orchestra is situated directly behind the last rows of those sections and (while they do indeed sound fantastic) drowned out some of the vocals.

"

Fully agreed. Think it started at 7:05-ish and wrapped just after 9:40.



But, Wicked, I thiiiink it's the 200 and 400 sections that have the orchestra behind them. I was in D in the 400s, and the band was behind row E, and it looked like the same was true across the way, which looking at the map would have been the 200s. That said, in Row D of the 400s, the band's sound levels were only an issue for me at one specific moment. Otherwise, the sound was pretty great!



It's a stunning piece. I saw it at Ars Nova and followed along in the lyrics. This time, I let go and let it wash over me. The latter was my preferred experience. It's just so, so beautiful, musically."

You’re absolutely right! It was the 200 and 400 sections. Just adjusted my original post - thank you! 

Updated On: 10/8/25 at 01:12 PM

[round2]

Posted: 10/8/25 at 3:53pm

Heather Christian has been named one of the MacArthur Foundation 2025 Genius Grant Winners.

 

 

 

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 10/22/25 at 9:28pm

Was very happy to finally be able to catch this. Quite a few empty seats which I found odd. But they have $40 rush that goes onsale an hour before showtime so if this seems outside your budget, do try for that. 

[TotallyEffed]

Posted: 10/22/25 at 9:53pm

I’ve been hoping this would pop up on TDF. What did you think, Jordan?

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 10/22/25 at 10:03pm

I really enjoyed it. But I need to sit with it for a while, I think. 
 

 

[kurtal]

Posted: 10/23/25 at 9:04am

I loved this at Ars Nova, and I loved it just as much at Signature.  I'd been grappling with how to describe it to people, and I landed on "It's not musical theatre; it's theatrical music."  

For anyone who hasn't seen it, I'd recommend to just sit back and let the experience wash over you.  The first 5-10 minutes are fairly impenetrable lyrically, by design.  But then once things open up (and the lyrics shift to predominantly English), it becomes more accessible.  There is humor.  There is contemplation.  There is grief.  There is wonder.

Truly I think this is one of the most transcendent experiences I've ever had in the theatre.  But you have to surrender to it for it to work.

[ColorTheHours048]

Posted: 10/23/25 at 10:21am

Also loved this just as much at Signature the other day as I did back at Ars Nova/Barrow Street. It’s meticulously constructed and deeply (sometimes overwhelmingly) intelligent, but it never feels stuffy or cold. Instead, it’s all catharsis and beauty. Desperately hoping we get a cast recording out of this run.

There was almost an entire row empty when I saw it, so definitely give their cancellation line a shot if you’re looking to get tickets (starts one hour before curtain, as Jordan mentioned above). (Edited because confusing.)

Updated On: 10/23/25 at 10:21 AM

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 10/23/25 at 10:23am

Just to clarify, the $40 rush is for anyone, not just under 35. 

[PipingHotPiccolo]

Posted: 10/23/25 at 9:50pm

Looking fwd to this. Was irritated that they seemed not to be selling anything for less than $125 despite empty seats at various performances but saw it on TodayTix "drops" for Saturday for reduced price, and grabbed a pair. 

[quizking101]

Posted: 10/23/25 at 9:57pm

kurtal said: "I loved this at Ars Nova, and I loved it just as much at Signature. I'd been grappling with how to describe it to people, and I landed on "It's not musical theatre;it's theatrical music."

For anyone who hasn't seen it, I'd recommend to just sit back and let the experience wash over you. The first 5-10 minutes are fairly impenetrable lyrically, by design. But then once things open up (and the lyrics shift to predominantly English), it becomes more accessible. There is humor. There is contemplation. There is grief. There is wonder.

Truly I think this is one of the most transcendent experiences I've ever had in the theatre. But you have to surrender to it for it to work."

I saw this last weekend and honestly could not have summarized this better myself. A major highlight is when some of the performers have their own solos with the ensemble harmonizing in the background. Jonathan Christopher and Angel Lozada stood out most for me.

[HBP]

Posted: 10/24/25 at 10:03am

While I enjoyed the experience, I didn't find it as transcendent as others on here. I did think the vocalists were incredible and there were a few very powerful moments where I agree it was best to let the music wash over you. I also thought the non-invasive audience interaction (really, just eye contact) was very effective, and I found myself observing the rest of the audience for much of the show as well. 

I'd definitely recommend it, particularly as they offer some great discounts for educators, etc., if you have the chance to see it at Signature.

[PipingHotPiccolo]

Posted: 10/25/25 at 11:24pm

alot to admire here but i found it hard to stay connected listening to (beautifully, beautifully sung) songs that were either in different languages or entirely indecipherable. as soon the show transitioned to clear lyrical moments, i was enraptured, but those moments were fleeting. 

still, the way its set up so that you are IN the show, and the vocalists and music surrounds you- wonderful. and these truly are some of the most talented singers performing as cohesively as ive ever seen in my life as an ensemble. Jonathan Christopher and Ashley Flanagan Perez stood out, but there isnt a weak link. 

Its an intimate experience that clearly works--someone in my row was weeping towards the end--and the intimacy carries throughout the audience in a way thats rare. Celebrities in the audience feel like theyre in the show with you, and I just wish I could better connect to a message for the first hour of the show. 

[Hey, Zelda!]

Posted: 10/27/25 at 5:20pm

Any word if there are plans for Oratorio after this run? A recording, productions elsewhere, things like that.

There's nominally a website and some socials for the show, but, from what I can see, they've been pretty dormant.

[steven22]

Posted: 10/27/25 at 6:09pm

I saw this on Saturday. I enjoyed it. I don’t know what happened or what was going on. Very different sort of theatrical experience. 

[iluvtheatertrash]

Posted: 10/27/25 at 7:10pm

steven22 said: "I saw this on Saturday. I enjoyed it. I don’t know what happened or what was going on. Very different sort of theatrical experience."

they told you what was going on. I think it is disingenuous to pretend you had no clue what any of it was trying to convey.

[PipingHotPiccolo]

Posted: 10/27/25 at 11:47pm

steven22 said: "I saw this on Saturday. I enjoyed it. I don’t know what happened or what was going on. Very different sort of theatrical experience."

whats frustrating is that the production knows that its audience doesnt know what happened--it gives you a QR code as you leave so you can look up the libretto. most ppl dont seem to mind this, and are transcended but i was in the camp that was more confounded. still worth seeing, though. 

[halfhourcheckwithmerman]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 12:20am

I saw this a couple days ago and found it transcendent at times and baffling at others. I was shocked the degree to which, by the end of the piece Christian eventually got me fully on her wavelength --- mostly through her sensational music, which is consistently brilliant and moving. And then the last five-or-so minutes kind of ruined it for me... the shift to speaking felt like it really broke the spell, and the whole thing suddenly felt quite twee. And I returned to a point of not really caring about what she was saying, which I'm embarrassed about, but still... 

But it's quite astonishing as a whole --- one of the most memorable times I've ever had in a theater. I would see it again. 

The eye-contact is simultaneously brilliant and terrifying, especially because it seems clear that the singers have been instructed to, if you especially engage their eye contact, not break eye contact with you unless you look away. When I casually met the singers' gazes, they would look away after a couple seconds, but if I really looked back, they would stay. If I smiled, they would smile at me. If I laughed, they would seem to as well (while singing). It was a little eerie. 

[iluvtheatertrash]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 9:48am

I made eye contact for a while with one performer, and some of what he was singing at the moment (about being broken apart and struggling to be put together again) really hit me with the way my life's been lately. I felt like he gave me permission to cry, and kept the gaze as I did. It was powerfully moving.

[SteveSanders]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 10:20am

I wonder how the prolonged eye contact might play out with anyone who grew up, or still lives, in a culture where eye contact is either not valued or even seen as a sign of mistrust or disrespect.

When I first started working internationally it took me some time to adjust to people avoiding eye contact and to modify my own behavior accordingly.

Updated On: 10/28/25 at 10:20 AM

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 10:47am

Funny to read about the eye contact. I was sat near an aisle right next to where people stood and at first I felt a bit uncomfortable with it, it’s not the level of “personal” you ever get at a show, someone singing right to your face, looking at right in your eyes. It makes you feel very vulnerable and I can see how it would be odd for people. But I just surrendered to the experience and found it added to the whole experience. 

[BensHairyAss]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 11:35am

The only thing I liked was the acoustics and the chorus.  It was like some boring concept musical except the concept is unclear unless you read the note from the playwright beforehand. Thankfully I did.  But even still, I didn’t really understand what she’s trying to say.  It doesn’t hold your attention at all.  You can barely hear the lyrics because they overlap with one another or in a different language.  Blank faces in the audience, bewildering experience.  

[CoffeeBreak]

Posted: 10/28/25 at 12:47pm

It's not really a musical.  But it's awesome.