"Pippin has sexual innuendos, cursing, an implied onstage orgy, and some violence. I'd let a 13 year old see it, but even that's pushing it. Kinky Boots is WAY more appropriate."
Yeah, because Kinky Boots only has multiple acts of onstage violence including a character being knocked unconscious in a fistfight and an on stage boxing match, a high level of sexual innuendo ("Mommy what do they mean the sex is in the heel... is someone going to have sex?") and a factory worker trying to seduce her boss no less, and get him to be unfaithful to his fiancé.
See, you can make almost any show sound inappropriate. As far as Pippin is concerned, letting a 13 year old see it is pushing it, and yet a 9 year old and a 12 year old actually performed in the show on Broadway as Theo. OMG, shouldn't someone be calling child protective services about that?
In reality, both shows are probably fine if you have a willingness to talk about and answer questions afterwards especially if you see Kinky Boots and this is their first exposure to Drag Queens. Maybe describe the scenes that might be questionable beforehand and get their reaction to it. If anything about Pippin, the scene with fire at the end might be the most "scary" or disconcerting for a 10 year old. A lot depends on the maturity of the child as well as their age. These days, kids, even 10 year olds see stuff that has as much violence and sexual innuendo as anything in either of these two shows on MTV and the Kardashians and are perhaps less prone to being shocked than most adults give them credit for.
Updated On: 2/20/15 at 02:23 AM