Let's face it...whichever Sondheim show you mention as best or worst, someone is going to disagree with you. Even the Sondheim I don't "love" has something redeemable, sometimes even remarkable.
I cannot understand how anyone can think FOLLIES is a bad show. It's brilliant. However, I thought the recent Broadway revival was overall pretty terrible. (Some fabulous individual performances though.) The London revival in 1988 was sensational. And, of course, the original....
Someone hated Passion, and I have to admit that I was less than enthusiastic about seeing it, but since we missed the Broadway run, my husband wanted to see the Kennedy Center production a few summers ago. Even the NYTimes said that the DC production bordered on historic. Michael Cerveris, Judy Kuhn and Rebecca Luker were simply amazing. The audience was blown away. I was moved to tears at the end.
And I adore COMPANY, which was the first Sondheim show I ever saw on Broadway (in 1970!), but even Sondheim himself said that he didn't understand the character of bobby until he saw the Kennedy Center production. (I am not comparing the two productions, mind you. I enjoyed them both immensely, but how can you compare the original cast of that show to ANY other????)
What I'm trying to say, I guess, is that the way Sondheim is produced is critical to its being appreciated. I didn't see Saturday Night or The Frogs, but, as someone else on is thread mentioned, even Sondheim's "worst" is better than most's "best." (Oooh, that was a tricky sentence.)
Sorry about the long post!
"Be on your guard! Jerks on the loose!"
http://www.roches.com/television/ss83kod.html
**********
"If any relationship involves a flow chart, get out of it...FAST!"
~ Best12Bars