Saw this last night and found the show lack, but enjoyable. My biggest gripe is that I wish the book and score were more dynamic, especially the first act. I find the overall subject to be interesting, but the structure of the book and narrative aren't very compelling. Luckily, the competency of the cast partially compensates for the lack of emotional and tonal range of the book/score. If anything, the musical sparked a desire to read the book on which its based to help flesh out the bullet-point highlights that make up the book of the musical. For a show based on an industry so highly dependent on colors, it's ironic that the book and score come across almost as monochromatic. Sure, there is a mix of ballad and uptempo songs, but the majority of them sound rather generic and too similar to be distinct or memorable. "Pink" was the only tune I could recall after the show and towers above as the stand-out number of the score. "War Paint" and the somber ballad in the restaurant in the first act (can't recall the name of the song...perhaps "If I'd Been a Man"
were both strong, musically, though I didn't care for the staging of "War Paint" at all. Some songs were more memorable for their staging or performances than the music itself such as "Fire and Ice" (which could have been a knockout number visually had not all the women been dressed exactly the same), "Forever Beautiful" and "Beauty in the World". And as for the book, the narrative structure quickly became repetitive and predictable to the point that I found it tedious. For every Helena moment, there is an equal and opposite Elizabeth moment and vice-versa. That is virtually every scene from start to finish and when you become aware of it, it's like you can hear a clock ticking at the start of each scene knowing the moment/song/scene will basically be repeated from the other perspective. This only adds a flatness of a book that skims these characters over a couple of decades. There is dialogue that provides some background into the women and its Helena that is more properly fleshed out as a character, but in the end, I felt like I had just flipped through an old photo album rather than having been told a story.
The cast is the highlight of the production. LuPone and Ebersole both knock it out of the park vocally, but it's LuPone who truly rises above with her acting. Her comedic moments are so good, it's impossible to tell if her delivery was inspired by the lines or if the lines were inspired by her performance. Ebersole packed a real punch, both vocally and emotionally, in her performance of "Pink", but the rest was pretty monotonous and generic. This could be due to the material she was given (LuPone was given a character with more ethnic flavor while Ebersole plays a stock WASPy type), but I felt like I was really just watching her perform Dorothy Brock in 42nd Street again (which isn't the compliment it may seem considering I have no idea how she ended up with a Tony for it). Sills and Dossett rise above their material to make an impression, even when saddled with "Dinosaurs" which needs to be replaced or cut.
<I>I didn't realize Patti Cohenour is in the company!</I>
I didn't either until I saw her listed in the program last night! I was so excited I got to see her perform, though she's ensemble and has little opportunity to stand out. I could recognize her distinctive voice when she had solo lines, though.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian