Posted: 12/8/19 at 6:06pm
100% agree with you, Luminaire. It's been brushed aside, and ignored, which is disrespectful and wrong. There definitely will be increased talk about this as the show progresses.
Updated On: 12/8/19 at 06:06 PM
Posted: 12/8/19 at 6:38pm
<<edited by BWW staff>>
I understand that many people don't approve of him sharing a private nude photo of someone, but exaggerating the severity of the offense doesn't accomplish anything except clouding the issue.
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 06:38 PM
Posted: 12/8/19 at 8:22pm
Exactly. Sharing someone’s personal nude photos and videos is a sexual violation. We need to bring ourselves into the present and redefine the terms. It’s the modern age of social media. If you do something sexually violating to someone (even virtually) you are a perpetrator of sexual trauma. The effects felt by the perpetrated are equally as devastating.
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 08:22 PM
Posted: 12/8/19 at 8:27pm
Nah, I won't stop doing that but feel free to keep on defending him every thread. I can state my opinion and what I know about him through 60 pages of court documents I read. He will always a danger and acted in a predatory manner, that's the conclusion I reached. It's my opinion. One does not have to break the law to be considered the word we are weirdly forbidden from using.
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 08:27 PM
Posted: 12/8/19 at 8:33pm
You absolutely can call him anything you want. You could call him a murderer, if you wanted. Defamation is hard to prove, and free speech is well-protected. But that doesn't mean it's accurate, or helpful.
Bettyboy72 said: "Sharing someone’s personal nude photos and videos is a sexual violation."
This is a much more accurate description.
I've only defended him when people are objectively wrong about some aspect of the suit. A couple months ago people were arguing that he was guilty of breaking revenge porn laws (he wasn't), and now others are claiming he's a sexual predator (he isn't, definitionally). That's as far as I'll go in my defense of Amar.
If you find it more "troubling" that I'm trying to correct bad information instead of the fact that people are saying it at all, then I don't know what to tell you.
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 08:33 PM
Posted: 12/8/19 at 11:13pm
kade.ivy said: "Soooo...MUSIC MAN to the Broadway, yes?"
Nope...MM to the Winter Garden loads in August
Posted: 12/8/19 at 11:56pm
Not to get things off this topic and back on the performances, but... there have been a few seats released for the first preview. $275 premiums in the orchestra and $179 for front mezz. Looks like 17 seats total.
And for the record, whether he is a "sexual predator" or not (I personally think he is), the guy should not be involved with this, or any other, production!
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:17am
Posted: 12/9/19 at 9:47am
There have been a number of posts removed and edited in this thread this morning that violate our rules. While we welcome the discussion of published reports and think that those conversations are important for the community, it is inappropriate to extrapolate those reports to assigning labels to individuals that were not done so by the courts.
So please feel free to continue to discuss the merits of the situation, but please avoid doing so in ways that confuse the legal facts in the case.
As a side note, we have made edits in some posts and have indicated that in them. You are welcome to remove the entire post by clearing the text, but do not remove the "edited by BWW staff" tag, as that is important to help people understand why there might be some continuity issues in the thread.
Posted: 12/9/19 at 11:19am
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks for doing the right thing, BWW.
This production of WSS seems to stray too far from the WSS I know and love. WSS without "I Feel Pretty"? Not for me. I do hope, however, that the show is a critical success for all involved.
Updated On: 12/9/19 at 11:19 AM
Posted: 12/9/19 at 3:09pm
Piparoo said: "I hate to interrupt all of the well-intentioned virtue signaling, but is anyone seeing the show tomorrow? I have tickets for April and am dying to know if it’s going to be any good."
I'll be there.
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:10pm
BJR said: "Piparoo said: "I hate to interrupt all of the well-intentioned virtue signaling, but is anyone seeing the show tomorrow? I have tickets for April and am dying to know if it’s going to be any good."
I'll be there."
Awesome! I hope you really enjoy it and will post your thoughts in the new previews thread!
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:22pm
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:24pm
GeorgeandDot said: "Heard that there's no playbills tonight. Wonder if this production won't have playbills which would seriously suck."
Invited dress usually don’t have them
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:25pm
GeorgeandDot said: "Heard that there's no playbills tonight. Wonder if this production won't have playbills which would seriously suck."
It’s invited dress. The invited dresses I have been to have never had playbills.
Posted: 12/9/19 at 8:31pm
GeorgeandDot said: "Heard that there's no playbills tonight. Wonder if this production won't have playbills which would seriously suck."
jesus christ
Posted: 12/10/19 at 5:18am
Posted: 12/10/19 at 6:02am
Posted: 12/10/19 at 6:52am
-One possible audience is anyone who has seen an archival revival of the show or the movie and is curious about a different take on it.
-Van Hove fans is another obvious audience.
-A possible third is the same demographic that finds contemporary Romeo and Juliet settings to be appealing.
-School groups are a likely fourth as lots of classes could do a compare and contrast between this production and the style/characterizations of the movie.
Posted: 12/10/19 at 8:40am
Something I absolutely hate when it comes to theater is when people judge the show before they even see it, or without even seeing a show. and this has happened far too often this season (Beetlejuice, Tootsie, West Side Story). I hate this. I understand it's kind of a given, but I really, really wish people would actually SEE the show for themselves because that is really the only way to know if you like it or not.
Posted: 12/10/19 at 8:48am
Posted: 12/10/19 at 8:54am
Jordan Catalano said: "Well I’m seeing the show next week when I’m back in the states, so I think I’m “Internet qualified” to write my full review of the show right now."
Oooooo I'd be so curious to hear what you think!!
Posted: 12/10/19 at 9:23am
I'd pay for Jordan's MadLib Reviews ....
"fill in the blanks before you even see the show and impress your online followers with how in the know you are."
Posted: 12/10/19 at 9:51am
magictodo123 said: "Something I absolutely hate when it comes to theater is when people judge the show before they even see it, or without even seeing a show. and this has happened far too often this season (Beetlejuice, Tootsie, West Side Story). I hate this. I understand it's kind of a given, but I really, really wish people would actually SEE the show for themselves because that is really the only way to know if you like it or not."
I understand, but when people are paying $100 + to see a show they need to be given a solid reason to spend money like that. Now, for people who continue to harp on this show who have zero intention to see it, just move on.
Posted: 12/10/19 at 9:57am
Mike Barrett said: "magictodo123 said: "Something I absolutely hate when it comes to theater is when people judge the show before they even see it, or without even seeing a show. and this has happened far too often this season (Beetlejuice, Tootsie, West Side Story). I hate this. I understand it's kind of a given, but I really, really wish people would actually SEE the show for themselves because that is really the only way to know if you like it or not."
I understand, but when people are paying $100 + to see a show they need to be given a solid reason to spend money like that. Now, for people who continue to harp on this show who have zero intention to see it, just move on."
I'm sure there are people who spend $100+ to see a show based on name alone. And they don't use social media, they don't do anything like that--they hear a big name is doing a show or something, and they want to see it. I'm sure that happened with (the most recent example I PERSONALLY can think of) War Paint, along with SO MANY other shows. It happens. Not EVERY single theatergoer reads reviews before they see a show. I don't. Do you think I'm the only one?
