I saw a production of Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf recently at the Shakespeare Theater of NJ, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. The actress playing Martha, Antoinette LaVecchia was absolute perfection. This was my first time seeing the play live, it’s a very good play, I see its appeal, but why is it so popular? What makes it so acclaimed?
To take a serious crack at giving you an answer.....I think that question is really difficult to answer, LOL.
I think those who love it see in it a brilliantly written play, and like the best and most enduring works of art, it says things about the human condition that stay true to new generations of audiences. Dealing with the disappointments of life, and the various ways people find to cope that, is something that nearly everyone will experience at some point, and the older you get, the more it resonates. And then seeing it performed well by great actors just adds a cherry on top.
I’m must be the only person who finds it a vile nasty piece of work, watching two drunk people constantly belittle each other. For me it doesn’t say anything that needs to be said.
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
rosscoe(au) said: "I’m must be the only person who finds it a vile nasty piece of work, watching two drunk people constantly belittle each other. For me it doesn’t say anything that needs to be said."
I don't think you're totally alone there. But I think it's the most glorious, gutting, darkly funny and devastating depiction of human beings' dependence upon illusion - - and the vileness & nastiness shows you just how desperately and angrily and fearfully people work to maintain their illusions.
I kind of agree, I didnt quite get the fuss on the play alone when I saw it years ago with Kathleen Turner. But I think what it does do is give two actors two really juicy parts and can be a thrilling showcase with the right people at the top of their game in the roles.
Leave it to Flash to start a thread questioning the quality of an all time classic play that has been on Broadway four times and has been produced thousands and thousands of times all around the world. Leave it to Flash.
rosscoe(au) said: "I’m must be the only person who finds it a vile nasty piece of work, watching two drunk people constantly belittle each other. For me it doesn’t say anything that needs to be said."
I'm seeing the Gillian Anderson /Billy Crudup London production in November. Press night is Wednesday so no reviews yet, but has anyone here already seen it? Any first- or second-hand reports on the production or on the relatively new Soho Place, where Zegler is taking up residency following the closing of Woolf?
TotallyEffed said: "rosscoe(au) said: "I’m must be the only person who finds it a vile nasty piece of work, watching two drunk people constantly belittle each other. For me it doesn’t say anything that needs to be said."
Why do you hang around here then?"
‘That actually made me laugh out loud.
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
TotallyEffed said: "rosscoe(au) said: "I’m must be the only person who finds it a vile nasty piece of work, watching two drunk people constantly belittle each other. For me it doesn’t say anything that needs to be said."
Matt Rogers said: "Leave it to Flash to start a thread questioning the quality of an all time classic play that has been on Broadway four times and has been produced thousands and thousands of times all around the world. Leave it to Flash."
I find the question pretty benign regardless of who might pose it. Threads are starting here all the time by all kinds of commenters about the popularity of certain shows, why XYZ is being revived yet again, who will be the next Mama Rose, et al.
SteveSanders said: "Matt Rogers said: "Leave it to Flash to start a thread questioning the quality of an all time classic play that has been on Broadway four times and has been produced thousands and thousands of times all around the world. Leave it to Flash."
I find the question pretty benign regardless of who might pose it. Threads are starting here all the time by all kinds of commenters about the popularity of certain shows, why XYZ is being revived yet again, who will be the next Mama Rose, et al.
"
Except that this is a poster who has been banned and has multiple accounts and screen names and just posts anything that comes into her head at any given moment of the day. Let’s do Cat on a Hot Tin Roof next!!!!!!!!
Some call it unrealistically dark, others call it unrealistically accurate. It’s also got the honor of having introduced MF to the white vernacular. Previously that one swear word was not only primarily Black, but heavily racially charged.
Wow, that’s really interesting about the swear word! I think the play is brilliant, but it’s not like I’ve seen it beyond the movie when I read and studied the play in school in 2006.
I think it teaches us what NOT to do in a long relationship. A lot of long term relationships and marriages have shades of this and I think the audience knows that. That’s why it’s a good piece of work. It’s not just alcoholism it explores. It also explores the weird compromises and ways to not go crazy when it’s just the two of you. These people are monsters but they have moments that make the audience of couples feel pointed at.
It's a masterpiece of dramatic construction with endlessly fascinating contradictions. Yes, it is produced much too often but like Salesman a strong production can make you see and hear things that you didn't catch the first time.
I can understand why some people don't like it, though. It's long, angry and depressing.